SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(Pat) 252

RAJEEV RANJAN PRASAD
Shashi Bhushan – Appellant
Versus
Lalit Narayan Mithila University – Respondent


Advocates:
For the Petitioners: M/s Kumar Kaushik (in 20839); Pramod Kumar Thakur (in 8444); Din Bandhu Mishra (in 18616); Rajendra Narain, Sr. Adv., Anju Narain, Umesh Kumar Roy, Anant Kumar Sinha (in 21322); Y.V. Giri, Sr. Adv., Pranav Kumar, Shristhti Singh(in 3979)
For the L.N.M.U. : Mr. Md. Nadim Seraj (in 20839)
For the B.S.U.S.C. : M/s P. K. Shahi, Sr. Adv., Pawan Kumar Chaudhary (in 20839, 21322)
For the U.G.C. : M/s (Dr.) Amrendra Nath Verma (in 20839, 21322).
For the Hon'ble Chancellor : Mr. Rana Vikram Singh (in 20839).
For the State : M/s Jitendra Kumar Roy-1, SC-13, U.K. Singh, AC to SC-13 (in 8444, 3979); Madhaw Prasad Yadaw, GP-23, Arvind Kumar, AC to GP-23 (in 18616); Prabhakar Jha, GP-27, Umesh Narayan Dubey, AC to GP-27 (in 21322).

Rajeev Ranjan Prasad, J.—Heard learned counsel for the petitioners, learned senior counsel for the Bihar State University Service Commission (hereinafter referred to as the ‘Commission’), the University and the State of Bihar.

2. These cases are though listed under the heading ‘For Judgment’ but at this stage also, this Court has heard learned counsel for the parties. Mr. P.K. Shahi, learned Senior Advocate has entered appearance on behalf of the Commission and assisted this Court.

3. These writ applications are involving a common issue, therefore, as agreed by the parties, all these matters have been heard together and are being disposed of by this common judgment.

For sake of clarity on facts, this Court would briefly mention the facts of each of the writ applications hereunder:—

CWJC No.20839 of 2021

4. There are altogether six petitioners in this case who are seeking a direction in the nature of a writ of mandamus to the respondent University to declare the petitioners eligible for appointment in the subject of Botany against the Advertisement No.PTT-01/2021 dated 18.08.2021. They are also praying for a writ in the nature of a writ of Certiorari to quash and cancel the list of candi

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top