Back
ASHUTOSH KUMAR, HARISH KUMAR
Anusha Kumari W/o Rohan – Appellant
Versus
Rohan Son of Mohan Prasad Sinha – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
HARISH KUMAR, J.
Heard Mr. Uday Prakash Shrarma, learned advocate for the appellant and Mr. Jitendra Singh, learned senior advocate assisted by Mr. Harsh Singh, learned advocate for the respondent.
2. The present Miscellaneous Appeal is directed against the judgment and decree dated 01.06.2019 and 14.06.2019, respectively, passed by the learned Principal Judge, Family Court, Muzaffarpur, in Matrimonial Case No. 55 of 2014, whereby the marriage between the appellant/wife and respondent/husband has been dissolved and decree of divorce has been passed on the ground of adultery.
3. The factual matrix of the case as is culled out from the records is that the marriage of the appellant/wife and the respondent/husband was solemnized on 19.02.2012. After performance of the rituals of marriage, the appellant/wife had gone to her matrimonial home and lived in Muzaffarpur along with her husband till 03.03.2012. The husband, after having stayed with the wife for about 14 days in Muzaffarpur, returned to his service on 03.03.2012.
4. It is the case of the respondent/husband that after leaving Muzaffarpur, there had never been any physical relationship with his wife for about five and a hal
The presumption of legitimacy under Section 112 of the Evidence Act is not easily rebutted and can only be dislodged by establishing a strong prima facie case. Refusal to undergo a D.N.A. test for th....
Section 112 of Indian Evidence Act, which reads as birth during marriage, conclusive proof of legitimacy.
(1) DNA test – Paternity of child – Any Matrimonial (Civil) dispute between husband and wife pertaining to child born from wedlock, cannot be used for their own benefit by way of DNA Paternity Test, ....
The presumption of legitimacy under Section 112 of the Evidence Act is conclusive and can only be rebutted by strong evidence of non-access; unilateral DNA tests conducted without consent are insuffi....
DNA Test – It is not always necessary to conduct DNA test to ascertain whether a particular child was born to a particular person – It is burden of person who alleges or disputes paternity that he ha....
The presumption of legitimacy under Section 112 of the Indian Evidence Act is conclusive and can only be rebutted by strong evidence of non-access; DNA tests should not be ordered without a prima fac....
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
