JUDGMENT :

ARUN KUMAR JHA, J.

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the respondents.

2. The present writ petition has been filed claiming the following reliefs :

“i. For quashing the impugned order dated 23.11.2016 passed in the light of Letter no. 3186 (3) dated 09.05.2016 staying the NIT no.-4 of 16-17 dated 08.12.2016 for re-tender and respondents be directed to open the financial bid of the petitioner company and award the tender in the favor of the petitioner company for which the petitioner company is entitled but without any notice/disposal of the petition dated 05.12.2016, the respondent Superintending Engineer, Bihar urban development authority, Urban development & Housing Department, Patna has canceled the tender and directed to Executive Officer, Nagar Parishad, Motipur to publish for re-tendering of the same work moreover if the work is not awarded to the petitioner company only may be met with loss of business but the state will also met with loss of Govt. exchequer, but under the reason best, the respondents are adamant not to award the work