IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
A.M. BADAR, J.
Name of the Appellant - ‘S’ (Name changed) – Appellant
Versus
The State of Bihar – Respondent
Criminal Appeal (SJ) No. 1297 of 2017
Decided On : 27-07-2022
Father - Rape of Minor Daughter - Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection of Children) Act, 2015, Section 74; Indian Penal Code, Section 228A
Fact of the Case:
The prosecutrix, a minor, alleged that her father committed rape on her. The trial court convicted the father based on the prosecutrix's testimony and medical evidence.
Finding of the Court:
The court found that the prosecutrix's testimony was unreliable and tutored by her mother, who had a motive to falsely implicate the father. The medical evidence did not support the prosecution's case.
Issues: Reliability of the prosecutrix's testimony, credibility of witnesses, and medical evidence
Ratio Decidendi: The court emphasized the need for trustworthy and unassailable evidence, especially in cases of sexual offenses. It highlighted the potential for false allegations and the importance of corroborating evidence.
Final Decision: The court acquitted the accused, overturning the trial court's conviction and sentence.
JUDGMENT :
A.M. BADAR, J.
1. Father is fortress, refuge and the trustee of his daughter. The prosecution case which is held to be true by the learned trial court is to the effect that act of the appellant/accused herein is a betrayal of the faith in the humanity inasmuch as the appellant, who happens to be father of the prosecutrix/PW-1 and who was under moral duty to protect her had himself committed rape on her. In view of the provisions of Section 74 of the Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection of Children) Act, 2015 as well as in view of object of Section 228A of the Indian Penal Code, I deem it appropriate to describe the appellant by word ‘S’. The Registry shall upload this Judgment and Order on the website by ensuring that the cause title is reflected in the similar manner.
2. The appellant is convicted of the offence punishable under Section 376 of the Indian Penal Code and is sentenced to suffer rigorous imprisonment for 10 years vide Judgment and Order dated 21.03.2017 and 22.03.2017 passed in Sessions Case No. 557 of 2009 by the learned Additional Sessions Judge-V, Purnea. This Judgment and Order of conviction and resultant sentence is impugned in the instant appeal by the appellant/father. For the sake of convenience, the appellant shall be referred to as “an accused.”
3. Facts in brief projected from the police report leading to the prosecution of the accused can be summarized thus:
(b) It is case of the prosecution that the accused was having good relation with the jurisdictional Police Station of Jankinagar. Hence, PW-3 Mrs. J took the prosecutrix/PW-1 to K. Hat Police Station (Khajanchi Hat Police Station) on the next day, i.e. on 02.07.2006. On that day, the Sub Inspector B. Bhushan of the said K. Hat Police Station recorded the F.I.R. lodged by the prosecutrix/PW-1 Ms. N. It was then sent to the Police Outpost of Jankinagar falling under jurisdiction of Police Station Banmankhi. That is how, Crime No. 149 of 2006 for the offence punishable under Section 376 of the Indian Penal Code came to be registered against the accused on 03.07.2006. Wheels of investigation were then set in motion.
(c) The prosecutrix/PW-1 Ms. N. was then sent to the Sadar Hospital, Purnea, on 03.07.2006 itself whereat PW-7 Dr. Sushila Das conducted her medical examination including the ossification test. St
B.C. Deva vs. State of Karnataka
Raju vs. State of M.P. (2008) 15 SCC 133
Ranjit Hazarika vs. State of Assam
The need for trustworthy and corroborating evidence in cases of sexual offenses, especially when the victim is a minor.
The testimony of the victim of sexual assault is vital and can be relied upon without corroboration, and delay in lodging a complaint does not necessarily indicate falsehood.
The testimony of the victim of sexual assault is vital and more reliable than that of an injured witness. Conviction can be founded on the testimony of the prosecutrix alone unless there are compelli....
: Statement of child witness had to be considered with all circumspection to rule out child being tutored for false implication of some person.
Onus of prosecution cannot be discharged by referring to very strong suspicion and existence of highly suspicious facts to inculpate accused nor falsity of defence could take place of proof which pro....
The prosecution failed to prove the case beyond reasonable doubt due to inconsistencies in the victim's testimony and unnatural conduct of the victim and her mother.
Acquittal in rape case upheld where prosecutrix turns hostile, denies force, disputes age records claiming majority, rendering testimony unreliable amid contradictions; prosecution fails beyond reaso....
The conviction cannot be based solely on the testimony of the prosecutrix if it is full of contradictions and lacks corroborative evidence.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.