IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY, NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR
NITIN B. SURYAWANSHI, PRAVIN S. PATIL, JJ.
Shankar S/o Bapurao Kale (In Jail) - Appellant
Versus
The State Of Maharashtra, Through P.s.o., P.s. - Respondent
CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.226 OF 2020
Decided On : 31-01-2025
(A) Indian Penal Code - Sections 376(2)(f), 376(2)(i), and 506 - Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012 - Sections 4 and 6 - Conviction of appellant for rape and related offences - The trial court sentenced the appellant to life imprisonment and a fine, which was challenged on grounds of delay in FIR and inconsistencies in victim's testimony. (Paras 1, 4, 18, 27)
(B) Delay in lodging FIR - The one-month delay in reporting the incident raised doubts about the prosecution's case, as the victim and her mother did not exhibit natural behavior post-incident. (Paras 18, 27)
(C) Credibility of testimony - The court found the evidence of the victim and her mother unreliable due to inconsistencies and unnatural conduct, leading to the conclusion that the prosecution failed to prove its case beyond reasonable doubt. (Paras 27, 28)
Facts of the case:
The appellant, the father of the victim, was accused of raping her on two occasions, with the first incident occurring on 09.06.2015 and the second on 08.07.2015. The FIR was lodged on 08.07.2015, one month after the first incident.
Findings of Court:
The trial court's conviction was overturned due to serious doubts about the prosecution's case, particularly regarding the credibility of the victim's testimony and the delay in reporting the incidents.
Issues: The main issues included the delay in lodging the FIR and the reliability of the victim's testimony.
Ratio Decidendi: The court ruled that the prosecution's case was not proven beyond reasonable doubt due to inconsistencies in the victim's account and the unnatural behavior of both the victim and her mother.
Result: Appeal allowed; conviction quashed and set aside.
JUDGMENT :
Nitin B. Suryawanshi, J.
1. This appeal challenges conviction of appellant under Sections 376(2)(f) and (i) and 506 of the Indian Penal Code and Sections 4 and 6 of the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012 (hereinafter referred to as “the Act of 2012”) awarded by learned Special Judge and Additional Sessions Judge, Kelapur, Dist. Yavatmal in Special Case No.22 of 2015 thereby, sentencing him to suffer imprisonment for life, for the remainder of natural life and to pay fine of Rs.5,000/- with a default cause. He is also convicted under Sections 4 and 6 of the Act of 2012 and sentenced to suffer Rigorous Imprisonment for life.
2. The prosecution case in short is that, accused/appellant, who is father of the victim, has committed rape on victim on 09.06.2015 at about 12.00 to 1.00 a.m. at Maregaon. After commission of rape, accused threatened her that he will kill her if she discloses the incident to anybody. The First Information Report (hereinafter referred to as “FIR”) of the incident was lodged by the victim on 08.07.2015, on the basis of same, Crime No.66 of 2015 was registered with Maregaon Police Station under Sections 376(2)(f), 370(4) and 506 of the IPC and Sections 4 and 6 of the Act of 2012. On completion of investigation, chargesheet was filed and case was numbered as Special Case No.22 of 2015. Appellant was charged under Sections 376, 506 of the IPC and Sections 4 and 6 of the Act of 2012. In support of its case, prosecution has examined 14 witnesses. Trial Court found appellant guilty. Hence, the present appeal.
3. Heard learned counsel for appellant and learned A.P.P. for State. Perused the record and the citations relied upon by learned counsel for appellant and learned A.P.P. for State.
4. Learned counsel for appellant assailed the judgment of the trial Court contending that there is delay of one month in lodging the FIR which is fatal to the prosecution case. He submits that the conduct of victim and her mother is not consistent with natural human conduct. They have reason to implicate appellant in a false case as appellant was not permitting withdrawal of amounts from his bank account and was not transferring agricultural land in the name of victim’s mother. He states that trial Court has wrongly appreciated the evidence and has committed an error in convicting appellant. He therefore, prayed for acquittal of appellant by relying on decision of this Court in Kailash s/o Chindhuji Pachare vs. State of Maharashtra, in Criminal Appeal No. 52 of 2016 decided on 23.01.2018.
5. Learned A.P.P. on the other hand supported the judgment of trial Court. She submitted that no girl would sacrifice her honor to falsely implicating her father. According to her, there is no merit in appeal and it may be dismissed.
6. Victim (PW-2) has deposed in her evidence that on 04.06.2015, her mother had gone to Jalna for delivery of her elder sister and she was at home along with her father/appellant. On 08.06.2015, at evening time, they had their dinner at about 10.00 p.m. Thereafter, she went to bed for sleeping. Her father was sleeping at the side of her bed. Between 00.00 hours to 1.00 hours at night, her father woke up and stated to her that she should allow him to sleep near her, but, she refused the same. Thereafter, he forcibly came on her bed and slept. He threatened her that she should not shout otherwise he would kill her. Thereafter, he removed her clothes and then committed sexual intercourse with her. On next morning, between 8.00 a.m. to 8.30 a.m. when her father went to answer nature’s call, she contacted her mother on phone and narrated the whole incident to her. Then, her mother returned back to home on the same day at about 7.00 to 7.30 p.m. from Jalna. Due to the said incident committed by her father with her, she felt very bad and she had a feeling of fear. Thereafter, on 08.07.2015, her father visited house of elder sister at Jalna, that day she went to school early in the morning and then she






The prosecution failed to prove the case beyond reasonable doubt due to inconsistencies in the victim's testimony and unnatural conduct of the victim and her mother.
The conviction for rape can be upheld based on the victim's credible testimony, even in the absence of corroborative physical evidence, emphasizing the importance of direct ocular evidence.
The testimony of a minor victim in sexual assault cases is sufficient for conviction if it inspires confidence, without the need for corroboration.
The court upheld the conviction against the appellant based solely on the victim's credible testimony, emphasizing that societal pressures do not negate the legal obligation to report sexual offenses....
The judgment emphasizes the importance of the victim's reliable and confident statement, the significance of discrepancies, belated reporting, and lack of corroboration and support from family member....
It is well settled that a prosecutrix complaining of having been a victim of offence of rape is not an accomplice after crime.
Point of Law : The chastity of a woman ruined as soon as such offence is committed, while in a civilized society, respect or reputation is a basic right. No member of society can afford to conceive t....
The sole testimony of a victim in a rape case can sustain a conviction if found credible, regardless of the existence of physical evidence or corroborating witnesses.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.