ORDER :

1. A jointness affidavit has been filed stating therein in paragraph nos. 1 & 2 that the respondent nos. 5 & 6 are living jointly with the respondent no. 4 and notice of the respondent nos. 5 & 6 has been received by the respondent no.-4 and they are in jointness. Similarly, notices issued upon the respondent nos. 9, 10 & 11 has been received by one Brajesh Kumar, who resides in the same house in jointness which has been stated in paragraph no.-2 of the jointness affidavit. Accordingly, notices issued upon the respondent nos. 5, 6, 9, 10 & 11 are treated to be validly served. Learned counsel for the respondent no. 3 is present. Heard Mr. Pramod Kumar Sinha, learned counsel for the petitioners and Mr. Ravi Shanker Pankaj, learned counsel for the respondents. The petitioners are aggrieved by the order dated 16.05.2019 and 21.10.2019 passed by learned Munsiff, Bakhri in T.S. No. 2/2012 by which two documents, which are certified copy of the sale deeds produced by the petitioners plaintiffs as a peace of documentary evidence have not been accepted by the trial court on the grounds that firstly the provision of law in the petition filed for bringing the documents on record is not