Arjun Yadav, S/o. Uttim Lal Yadav @ Uttim Lal Yadav vs State of Bihar

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

2023 Supreme(Pat) 584

CHAKRADHARI SHARAN SINGH, RAJESH KUMAR VERMA
Arjun Yadav, S/o. Uttim Lal Yadav @ Uttim Lal Yadav – Appellant
Versus
State of Bihar – Respondent

Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellant : Mr. Ajay Kumar Thakur, Mr. Md. Imteyaz Ahmad, Mr. Ritwaj Raman, Ms. Vaishnavi Singh, Mr. Udhbav.
For the Respondent: Ms. Shashi Bala Verma, APP.

JUDGMENT :

Chakradhari Sharan Singh, J.

Heard Mr. Ajay Kumar Thakur, learned counsel for the appellant and Ms. Shashi Bala Verma, learned Additonal Public Prosecutor for the State.

2. By the impugned judgment and order dated 16.03.2020/30.06.2020 passed by learned Additional District and Sessions Judge-1 cum Special Judge, Supaul, in POCSO Case No. 47 of 2018, arising out of Triveniganj P.S. Case No. 279 of 2018, the appellant has been convicted and sentenced as under :

Conviction under Section	Sentence
Conviction under Section	Imprisonment	Fine (Rs.)	In default of fine
302/201 of the IPC	Imprisonment for life	50,000/-	-
376 of the IPC	Imprisonment for life, which shall mean imprisonment for the reminder of that person’s natural life	50,000/-	-
364 of the IPC	R.I. for ten year	50,000/-	-
4 of the POCSO Act	No separate sentence has been awarded under these Sections	-	-
6 of the POCSO Act	No separate sentence has been awarded under these Sections	-	-

3. A written report of the victim’s mother dated 19.07.2018 addressed to the officer in-charge, Triveniganj Police Station in the District Supaul is the bas

Click Here to Read the rest of this document

2023 Supreme(Pat) 584

CHAKRADHARI SHARAN SINGH, RAJESH KUMAR VERMAArjun Yadav, S/o. Uttim Lal Yadav @ Uttim Lal Yadav – AppellantVersusState of Bihar – Respondent

Cases Referred (5)

CHAKRADHARI SHARAN SINGH, RAJESH KUMAR VERMA
Arjun Yadav, S/o. Uttim Lal Yadav @ Uttim Lal Yadav – Appellant
Versus
State of Bihar – Respondent