SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(Pat) 691

A. M. BADAR
Manoj Yadav – Appellant
Versus
State of Bihar – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
For the Appellant : Mr. Prince Kumar Mishra, Amicus Curiae.
For the Respondent: None.

A. M. Badar, J. – By this appeal, appellant/convicted accused, Manoj Yadav is challenging the Judgment and order dated 10.01.2017 and 11.01.2017 passed by the learned Ist Additional Sessions Judge, Munger in Sessions Case No. 642 of 2013 arising out of Muffassil P.S. Case No. 153 of 2013, thereby convicting him of the offences punishable under Sections 25(1)(a), 25(1-B) and 26(2) of the Arms Act, 1959. For the offence punishable under Section 25(1)(a) of the Arms Act, the appellant is sentenced to suffer rigorous imprisonment for six years apart from imposition of fine of Rs.5000/- and default sentence of simple imprisonment for six months. For the offence punishable under Section 28(1-B) of the Arms Act, the appellant is sentenced to suffer rigorous imprisonment for two years apart from imposition of fine of Rs.1000/- and default sentence of simple imprisonment for one month. For the offence punishable under Section 26(2) of the Arms Act, the appellant is sentenced to suffer rigorous imprisonment for six years apart from imposition of fine of Rs.5000/- and default sentence of simple imprisonment for six months. Substantive sentences are directed to run concurrently by the learned

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top