SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(Pat) 402

A. M. BADAR
Kapildeo Thakur – Appellant
Versus
State of Bihar – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
For the Appellant : M/s Prince Kumar Mishra, Ram Niwas Prasad.
For the Respondent: None.

A. M. Badar, J.—By this appeal, appellant/convicted accused, Kapildeo Thakur is challenging the Judgment and order dated 15.09.2017 and 20.09.2017 passed by the learned Sessions Judge, Munger in Sessions Trial No. 228 of 2016 between the parties, thereby convicting him of the offences punishable under Sections 25(1-B)a r/w 35, 25(1-AA) r/w 35 and 26 r/w 35 of the Arms Act, 1959. For the offence punishable under Sections 25(1-B)a r/w 35 of the Arms Act, he is sentenced to suffer rigorous imprisonment of five years apart from imposition of fine of Rs.10,000/- and default sentence of simple imprisonment for three months. For the offence punishable under Sections 25(1-AA) r/w 35 of the Arms Act, the appellant is sentenced to suffer rigorous imprisonment for ten years apart from imposition of fine of Rs. 50,000/- and default sentence of simple imprisonment for six months. For the offence punishable under Sections 26 r/w 35 of the Arms Act, he is sentenced to suffer rigorous imprisonment for seven years apart from imposition of fine of Rs.10,000/- and default sentence of simple imprisonment for three months. Substantive sentences are directed to run concurrently by the learned trial cour

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top