SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(Pat) 692

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CHAKRADHARI SHARAN SINGH and NAWNEET KUMAR PANDEY, JJ.
Criminal Appeal (DB) No.206 of 2021
(17.7.2023)
Miraj Mian ... Appellant
vs.
State of Bihar ... Respondents

Advocates appeared:
For the Appellant : M/s Ramakant Sharma, Sr. Adv., Lakshmi Kant Sharma, Akshay Ashish.
For the Respondent: Mr. Sujit Kumar Singh, APP.

Headnote:

Indian Penal Code, 1860 – Section 376(2) & Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012 (POCSO Act) – Section 6 – The appelant alleged to have raped a 6 year old minor daughter of the informant – evidence of the victim appears to be truthful and unwavering – Once a victim of rape, particularly, a child is found to be truthful in her deposition, the said evidence is adequate to establish charge of commission of offence punishable under Section 376 (2) (i) of the I.P.C. and Section 6 of the POCSO Act – further, the medical evidence has fully corroborated the prosecution's case, inasmuch as, the doctor (PW-5) deposed at the trial that the victim was firstly treated at the Primary Health Centre and she had found the hymen of the victim ruptured – no medicial examination of the appellant having been conducted as contemplated u/s 53A of the Cr. P.C., the prosecution case has not been weakened in the facts and circumstance of the present case – the requirement under Section 53A of Cr.P.C. of medical examinaton of a person charged of commission of a sexual offence is not a mandatory requirement – further, where the victim, a minor innocent child has given a vivid description of the manner in which the sexual assault was committed by the appellant upon her, the FSL report of the victim's clothes, which were sent for scientific examination being not brought or record, has not made the conviction unsustainable – further, if a person is prosecuted for committing or abetting or attempting to commit any offence under Sections 3, 5, 7 and 9 of POCSO Act, the special court shall presume that such person has committed or abetted or attempted to commit the offence, as the case may be unless contrary is proved finding of conviction recorded by trial court does not suffer from any legal infirmity and accordingly upheld – however, sentence of life imprisonment to remainder of the natural life reduced to the sentence of imprisonment to a term of 20 years of rigorous imprisonment with applicable remission. (Paras 14, 15, 16, 17, 18 & 36)

(2013) 11 SCC 382, (2008) 7 SCC 550, (2006) 2 SCC 359, (2004) 2 SCC 590, (2004) 1 SCC 475, (2003) 8 SCC 13, (1994) 2 SCC 220 & (1976) 1 SCC 281 – Referred.

Chakradhari Sharan Singh, J. – By the impugned judgment and order dated 29.01.2021/ 30.01.2021 passed by the learned Exclusive Special Court (POCSO) cum Additional Sessions Judge-VI, Rohtas at Sasaram in POCSO Case No. 20 of 2018, Kargahar P.S. Case No. 131 of 2018, the appellant has been convicted and sentenced as under: –

Conviction under Section

Imprisonment

Sentence Fine (Rs.)

In default of fine

376(2) of the IPC

RI for Life

60,000/-

RI for one year

6 of the POCSO Act

X

X

X

2. The victim’s name is not being disclosed in the present judgment in tune with the requirement under Section 228A of the Indian Penal Code and has been referred to as the child/victim in the present judgment.

3. Father of the victim is the informant on whose fardbeyan Kargahar P.S. Case No. 131 of 2018 came to be registered for commission of offence punishable under Section 376 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 4 of the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012 (POCSO Act in short). According to the fardbeyan recorded by an Assistant Sub-Inspector of Police at Sadar Hospital, Sasaram at Sadar Hospital, Sasaram on 10.04.2018, at about 8:00 p.m., on the said date, at 1:00 p.m. when he was nearly 500 yards away from his house, he heard cries from a nearby hut. No sooner did he reach near the hut, he saw the appellant fleeing away. He thereafter saw his minor daughter completely nude and profusely bleeding. He managed to lift her daughter to his house. He, thereafter rushed to apprehend the appellant and after having apprehended him, produced before the police at the police station. In the meanwhile, the informant’ s wife also came to the police station with the victim. On having been enquired by the police officials at the police station, the victim disclosed the name of the appellant, who had taken her inside the hut and committed wrong with her (gandaa-kaam). This led to registration of the aforesaid F.I.R. The appellant was arrested on 10.04.2018 itself and was remanded to judicial custody on 11.8.2018. The victim was examined by a Medical Board constituted by the Deputy Superintendent, Sadar Hospital, Sasaram on 10.04.2018 at 8:30 PM before which she was taken to Primary Health Centre, Kargahar. Following is the finding of the Medical Board: –

"Examined the victim (name concealed) aged about 6 years, D/o Baban Singh, Vill + Post-Kargahar, Dist-Rohtas at 8:30 PM on 10.04.2018 on police requisition provided by Md. Anul Hoda Khan, S.I. P.S. Kargahar dated 10.04.2018 by a Medical Board constituted by D.S. Sadar Hospital, Sasaram consisting of Dr. Kanchan Kumari, Dr. Naresh Prasad and Dr. S.S. Prasad.

Treatment History: – Pt was treated firstly at P.H.C. Kargahar vide registration no. 574E/10/4/18 written on EMG OD slip bleeding p/v and treatment given as injection gentamycin and injection T.T.

Examination of the victim: –

M.I.- Til over the right side of upper lip

(1) No external injuries found over the any part of the body except private part where cotton was placed and bandage apply. No undergarment was present.

(2) Axillary hair absent. Breast not develop.

3. On removing blood soaked bandage and cotton found as follows :- Pubic hair absent

-Bleeding P/V seen clot

-Hymen rupture

-Fourchett lacerated longitudinally extending downward over posterior wall of vaginal canal deeply up to the rectum.

-Vaginal swab taken and prepared the slip and sent to the pathologist, Sadar Hospital, Sasaram for Microscopic Examination and report.

(4) Treatment given in O.T: – under IV Anaesthesia tear repaired with vicryl No. 1. Complete Hemostasis required. Rectal examination done and found rectum tear. Dressing done. Treatment and followup done.

(5) Microscopic Examination of vaginal swab done by the pathologist, Sadar Hospital, Sasaram Dr. S.S. Prasad, Report on dated 10.04.2018 as follows:-

Spermatozoa- Not found either alive or dead

RB

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top