SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

PATNA HIGH COURT
Chakradhari Sharan Singh and Nawneet Kumar Pandey, JJ.
Miraj Mian – Appellant
versus
State of Bihar – Respondent
Criminal Appeal (DB) No.206 of 2021
Decided on 17.7.2023

Advocates:
Counsel for the Parties:
For the Appellant:Mr. Ramakant Sharma, Sr. Advocate, Mr. Lakshmi Kant Sharma and Mr. Akshay Ashish, Advocate
For the Respondent: Mr. Sujit Kumar Singh, APP

IMPORTANT POINT
Rape of girl child – Once a victim of rape, particularly, a child is found to be truthful in her deposition, said evidence is adequate to establish charge of commission of offence punishable under Section 376(2) (i) of IPC and Section 6 of POCSO Act.

Headnote:

(A) Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012 – Section 4 read with Sections 29 and 30 – Indian Penal Code, 1860 – Section 376 – Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 – Section 53-A – Rape of girl child – Conviction and sentence – Victim in her statement under Section 164 of Cr.P.C. recorded by Magistrate gave explicit description of penetrative sexual assault caused by appellant – Evidence of victim appears to be truthful and unwavering – Once a victim of rape, particularly, a child is found to be truthful in her deposition, said evidence is adequate to establish charge of commission of offence punishable under Section 376(2) (i) of IPC and Section 6 of POCSO Act – Requirement under Section 53-A of Cr.P.C. of medical examination of a person charged of commission of a sexual offence is not a mandatory requirement – Victim, a minor innocent child has given a vivid description of manner in which sexual assault was committed by appellant upon her – Evidence of victim is duly corroborated by medical evidence and other circumstances – Prosecution’s witnesses have fully supported prosecution’s case – There was no attempt at all made by or on behalf of appellant to get over the presumption under Section 29 of Act – Judgment of conviction affirmed. (Paras 14 to 18)

(B) Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012 – Sections 4 and 42 – Indian Penal Code, 1860 – Section 376 – Rape of girl child – Life sentence for remainder of appellant’s natural life – Maximum punishment, post-amendment [Act 22 of 2018 with effect from 21.04.2018] is death and includes imprisonment for life meaning imprisonment for remainder of that person’s natural life – Appellant has no criminal antecedent – Appellant is a landless person aged 30 years – As on date he has a family with his wife and two minor children aged nine and five years – These are mitigating circumstances to revisit sentence – It just and proper to modify order of sentence of imprisonment from life imprisonment till remainder of appellant’s natural life to a term of 20 years of rigorous imprisonment with remission as may be applicable under law – Rest of terms of impugned judgment and order of trial court shall remain unaltered. (Paras 27, 34 to 37)

Result: Appeal allowed in part.

JUDGMENT (ORAL)

Chakradhari Sharan Singh, J.—By the impugned judgment and order dated 29.01.2021/ 30.01.2021 passed by the learned Exclusive Special Court (POCSO) cum Additional Sessions Judge-VI, Rohtas at Sasaram in POCSO Case No. 20 of 2018, Kargahar P.S. Case No. 131 of 2018, the appellant has been convicted and sentenced as under:—

NDPS Act

Conviction under Section

Sentence

 

Imprisonment

Fine (Rs.)

In default of fine

376(2) of the IPC

 

6 of the POCSO Act

POCSO Act

 

X

60,000/-

 

X

RI for one year

X

2. The victim’s name is not being disclosed in the present judgment in tune with the requirement under Section 228A of the Indian Penal Code and has been referred to as the child/victim in the present judgment.

3. Father of the victim is the informant on whose fardbeyan Kargahar P.S. Case No. 131 of 2018 came to be registered for commission of offence punishable under Section 376 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 4 of the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012 (POCSO Act in short). According to the fardbeyan recorded by an Assistant Sub-Inspector of Police at Sadar Hospital, Sasaram at Sadar Hospital, Sasaram on 10.04.2018, at about 8:00 p.m., on the said date, at 1:00 p.m. when he was nearly 500 yards away from his house, he heard cries from a nearby hut. No sooner did he reach near the hut, he saw the appellant fleeing away. He thereafter saw his minor daughter completely nude and profusely bleeding. He managed to lift her daughter to his house. He, thereafter rushed to apprehend the appellant and after having apprehended him, produced before the police at the police station. In the meanwhile, the informant’ s wife also came to the police station with the victim. On having been enquired by the police officials at the police station, the victim disclosed the name of the appellant, who had taken her inside the hut and committed wrong with her (gandaa-kaam). This led to registration of the aforesaid F.I.R. The appellant was arrested on 10.04.2018 itself and was remanded to judicial custody on 11.8.2018. The victim was examined by a Medical Board constituted by the Deputy Superintendent, Sadar Hospital, Sasaram on 10.04.2018 at 8:30 PM before which she was taken to Primary Health Centre, Kargahar. Following is the finding of the Medical Board:—

“Examined the victim (name concealed) aged about 6 years, D/o Baban Singh, Vill + Post-Kargahar, Dist-Rohtas at 8:30 PM on 10.04.2018 on police requisition provided by Md. Anul Hoda Khan, S.I. P.S. Kargahar dated 10.04.2018 by a Medical Board constituted by D.S. Sadar Hospital, Sasaram consisting of Dr. Kanchan Kumari, Dr. Naresh Prasad and Dr. S.S. Prasad.

Treatment History:- Pt was treated firstly at P.H.C. Kargahar vide registration no. 574E/10/4/18 written on EMG OD slip bleeding p/v and treatment given as injection gentamycin and injection T.T.

Examination of the victim:-

M.I.- Til over the right side of upper lip

(1) No external injuries found over the any part of the body except private part where cotton was placed and bandage apply. No undergarment was present.

(2) Axillary hair absent. Breast not develop.

3. On removing blood soaked bandage and cotton found as follows:—

Pubic hair absent

-Bleeding P/V seen clot

-Hymen rupture

-Fourchett lacerated longitudinally extending downward over posterior wall of vaginal canal deeply up to the rectum.

-Vaginal swab taken and prepared the slip and sent to the pathologist, Sadar Hospital, Sasaram for Microscopic Examination and report.

(4) Treatment given in O.T.: — under IV Anaesthesia tear repaired with vicryl No. 1. Complete Hemostasis required. Rectal examination done and found rectum tear. Dressing done. Treatment and followup done.

(5) Microscopic Examination of vaginal swab done by the pathologist, Sadar Hospita

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top