PATNA HIGH COURT
Chakradhari Sharan Singh and Nawneet Kumar Pandey, JJ.
Miraj Mian – Appellant
versus
State of Bihar – Respondent
Criminal Appeal (DB) No.206 of 2021
Decided on 17.7.2023
(A) Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012 – Section 4 read with Sections 29 and 30 – Indian Penal Code, 1860 – Section 376 – Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 – Section 53-A – Rape of girl child – Conviction and sentence – Victim in her statement under Section 164 of Cr.P.C. recorded by Magistrate gave explicit description of penetrative sexual assault caused by appellant – Evidence of victim appears to be truthful and unwavering – Once a victim of rape, particularly, a child is found to be truthful in her deposition, said evidence is adequate to establish charge of commission of offence punishable under Section 376(2) (i) of IPC and Section 6 of POCSO Act – Requirement under Section 53-A of Cr.P.C. of medical examination of a person charged of commission of a sexual offence is not a mandatory requirement – Victim, a minor innocent child has given a vivid description of manner in which sexual assault was committed by appellant upon her – Evidence of victim is duly corroborated by medical evidence and other circumstances – Prosecution’s witnesses have fully supported prosecution’s case – There was no attempt at all made by or on behalf of appellant to get over the presumption under Section 29 of Act – Judgment of conviction affirmed. (Paras 14 to 18)
(B) Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012 – Sections 4 and 42 – Indian Penal Code, 1860 – Section 376 – Rape of girl child – Life sentence for remainder of appellant’s natural life – Maximum punishment, post-amendment [Act 22 of 2018 with effect from 21.04.2018] is death and includes imprisonment for life meaning imprisonment for remainder of that person’s natural life – Appellant has no criminal antecedent – Appellant is a landless person aged 30 years – As on date he has a family with his wife and two minor children aged nine and five years – These are mitigating circumstances to revisit sentence – It just and proper to modify order of sentence of imprisonment from life imprisonment till remainder of appellant’s natural life to a term of 20 years of rigorous imprisonment with remission as may be applicable under law – Rest of terms of impugned judgment and order of trial court shall remain unaltered. (Paras 27, 34 to 37)
Result: Appeal allowed in part.
JUDGMENT (ORAL)
Chakradhari Sharan Singh, J.—By the impugned judgment and order dated 29.01.2021/ 30.01.2021 passed by the learned Exclusive Special Court (POCSO) cum Additional Sessions Judge-VI, Rohtas at Sasaram in POCSO Case No. 20 of 2018, Kargahar P.S. Case No. 131 of 2018, the appellant has been convicted and sentenced as under:—
| NDPS Act | |||
| Conviction under Section | Sentence | ||
|
| Imprisonment | Fine (Rs.) | In default of fine |
| 376(2) of the IPC
6 of the POCSO Act | POCSO Act
X | 60,000/-
X | RI for one year X |
2. The victim’s name is not being disclosed in the present judgment in tune with the requirement under Section 228A of the Indian Penal Code and has been referred to as the child/victim in the present judgment.
3. Father of the victim is the informant on whose fardbeyan Kargahar P.S. Case No. 131 of 2018 came to be registered for commission of offence punishable under Section 376 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 4 of the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012 (POCSO Act in short). According to the fardbeyan recorded by an Assistant Sub-Inspector of Police at Sadar Hospital, Sasaram at Sadar Hospital, Sasaram on 10.04.2018, at about 8:00 p.m., on the said date, at 1:00 p.m. when he was nearly 500 yards away from his house, he heard cries from a nearby hut. No sooner did he reach near the hut, he saw the appellant fleeing away. He thereafter saw his minor daughter completely nude and profusely bleeding. He managed to lift her daughter to his house. He, thereafter rushed to apprehend the appellant and after having apprehended him, produced before the police at the police station. In the meanwhile, the informant’ s wife also came to the police station with the victim. On having been enquired by the police officials at the police station, the victim disclosed the name of the appellant, who had taken her inside the hut and committed wrong with her (gandaa-kaam). This led to registration of the aforesaid F.I.R. The appellant was arrested on 10.04.2018 itself and was remanded to judicial custody on 11.8.2018. The victim was examined by a Medical Board constituted by the Deputy Superintendent, Sadar Hospital, Sasaram on 10.04.2018 at 8:30 PM before which she was taken to Primary Health Centre, Kargahar. Following is the finding of the Medical Board:—
“Examined the victim (name concealed) aged about 6 years, D/o Baban Singh, Vill + Post-Kargahar, Dist-Rohtas at 8:30 PM on 10.04.2018 on police requisition provided by Md. Anul Hoda Khan, S.I. P.S. Kargahar dated 10.04.2018 by a Medical Board constituted by D.S. Sadar Hospital, Sasaram consisting of Dr. Kanchan Kumari, Dr. Naresh Prasad and Dr. S.S. Prasad.
Treatment History:- Pt was treated firstly at P.H.C. Kargahar vide registration no. 574E/10/4/18 written on EMG OD slip bleeding p/v and treatment given as injection gentamycin and injection T.T.
Examination of the victim:-
M.I.- Til over the right side of upper lip
(1) No external injuries found over the any part of the body except private part where cotton was placed and bandage apply. No undergarment was present.
(2) Axillary hair absent. Breast not develop.
3. On removing blood soaked bandage and cotton found as follows:—
Pubic hair absent
-Bleeding P/V seen clot
-Hymen rupture
-Fourchett lacerated longitudinally extending downward over posterior wall of vaginal canal deeply up to the rectum.
-Vaginal swab taken and prepared the slip and sent to the pathologist, Sadar Hospital, Sasaram for Microscopic Examination and report.
(4) Treatment given in O.T.: — under IV Anaesthesia tear repaired with vicryl No. 1. Complete Hemostasis required. Rectal examination done and found rectum tear. Dressing done. Treatment and followup done.
(5) Microscopic Examination of vaginal swab done by the pathologist, Sadar Hospita
State of Punjab vs. Prem Sagar and Ors.
Shailesh Jasvantbhai and Anr. vs. State of Gujarat and Ors.
Union of India vs. Kuldeep Singh
State of Karnataka vs. Puttaraja
State of M.P. vs. Ghanshyam Singh (2003) 8 SCC 13.(Para 23) – Relied.
Dhananjoy Chatterjee vs. State of W.B.
Ramashraya Chakravarti vs. State of Madhya Pradesh (1976) 1 SCC 281.(Para 23) – Relied.
Rape of girl child – Once a victim of rape, particularly, a child is found to be truthful in her deposition, said evidence is adequate to establish charge of commission of offence punishable under Se....
The court upheld the conviction for rape under IPC and POCSO Act, emphasizing the credibility of the victim's testimony and the need for sensitivity in child sexual assault cases.
The court affirmed that prior legal standards apply to convictions, emphasizing the necessity of valid evidence and proper assessment of child witnesses' competency in sexual assault cases.
The conviction for rape of a minor was modified from life imprisonment under IPC to 10 years under POCSO due to evidential shortcomings and the application of unamended statutes relevant at the time ....
The statutory presumption of guilt under Section 29 of the POCSO Act places the burden on the accused to prove their innocence in cases of sexual offences against children, which was upheld in this j....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.