Miraj Mian VS State of Bihar

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

CHAKRADHARI SHARAN SINGH, NAWNEET KUMAR PANDEY
Miraj Mian – Appellant
Versus
State of Bihar – Respondent

Advocates:
Counsel for the Parties:
For the Appellant:Mr. Ramakant Sharma, Sr. Advocate, Mr. Lakshmi Kant Sharma and Mr. Akshay Ashish, Advocate
For the Respondent: Mr. Sujit Kumar Singh, APP

JUDGMENT (ORAL)

Chakradhari Sharan Singh, J.—By the impugned judgment and order dated 29.01.2021/ 30.01.2021 passed by the learned Exclusive Special Court (POCSO) cum Additional Sessions Judge-VI, Rohtas at Sasaram in POCSO Case No. 20 of 2018, Kargahar P.S. Case No. 131 of 2018, the appellant has been convicted and sentenced as under:—

NDPS Act
Conviction under Section	Sentence
	Imprisonment	Fine (Rs.)	In default of fine
376(2) of the IPC 6 of the POCSO Act	POCSO Act X	60,000/- X	RI for one year X

2. The victim’s name is not being disclosed in the present judgment in tune with the requirement under Section 228A of the Indian Penal Code and has been referred to as the child/victim in the present judgment.

3. Father of the victim is the informant on whose fardbeyan Kargahar P.S. Case No. 131 of 2018 came to be registered for commission of offence punishable under Section 376 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 4 of the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012 (POCSO Act in

Click Here to Read the rest of this document

CHAKRADHARI SHARAN SINGH, NAWNEET KUMAR PANDEYMiraj Mian – AppellantVersusState of Bihar – Respondent

Cases Referred (8)

CHAKRADHARI SHARAN SINGH, NAWNEET KUMAR PANDEY
Miraj Mian – Appellant
Versus
State of Bihar – Respondent