SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(Pat) 730

P. B. BAJANTHRI, ARUN KUMAR JHA
Sunita Sinha – Appellant
Versus
State of Bihar – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
For the Petitioner: Mr. Krishna Chandra.
For the Respondents: Mr. Vikash Kumar, SC-11.

Arun Kumar Jha, J. – Learned counsels for the respective parties have been heard on the last date of hearing.

2. The petitioner has filed the instant writ petition seeking the following reliefs: –

“(i) For issuance of appropriate Writ/Writs, direction/ directions or orders/order especially in the nature of Certiorari, for quashing the order dated 02.09.2022 passed by Additional Chief Secretary, Prohibition, Excise and Registration Department, Government of Bihar (Res. No.-2) in Excise Revision No.-194/2022 in connection with Excise Appeal Case No. 362/2022 (arising out of Excise Confiscation Case No. 3138/2022), to the extent, whereby and whereunder while allowing the premises in question owned by petitioner to be released (as the same was confiscated in connection with Excise Case being Ramkrishna Nagar P.S. Case No.-259/2020) in her favor, has directed to make payment of Rs. 10,00,000/-(Rs. Ten Lakh Only), which is very exorbitant and unreasonable.

(ii) The petitioner further prays for issuance of appropriate Writ/Writs, direction/directions or orders/order especially in the nature of Certiorari, quashing the order dated 27/06/2022 passed by Excise Commissioner (Res. No.-3), in Exc

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top