IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
P. B. BAJANTHRI and ARUN KUMAR JHA, JJ.
CWJC No.9034 of 2023
(17.8.2023)
Shivpujan Yadav @ Shivpujan Singh ... Petitioner
vs.
State of Bihar & Ors. ... Respondents
Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Rules, 2022–Rule 12B–Confiscation Proceeding–Penalty of Rs. 7,00,000/- imposed, subsequently reduced to Rs.– 5,00,000/- in revision–Confiscating Authority's order is not in terms of sub-rule (2) of Rule 12 B of Bihar Prohibition and Excise Rules, 2021–therefore, impugned confiscation order and consequential order of appellate authority and revisional authority set aside–matter remanded to the confiscating Authority to re-determine the penalty after giving ample opportunity of leaving to the petitioner–competent authorities directed to take note of sub-rule (2) of Rule 12 of Bihar Prohibition and Excise Rules, 2021 before determining the penalty copy of this order directed to be forwarded to the Addl. Chief Secretary, Prohibition and Excise, Govt. of Bihar to guide the respective collectors who are handling the confiscation proceedings. (Paras 6, 10 & 11)
P. B. Bajanthri, J. – With the consent of the learned counsel for the respective parties, matter is taken up for final disposal.
2. In compliance of our previous order dated 03.08.2023, Sanjay Kumar Sinha, ADM, Rohtas is present in the Court.
3. A supplementary affidavit has been filed on behalf of respondent nos.3 and 4 which is taken on record.
4. In the instant petition, petitioner has prayed for the following reliefs: –
(i) For issuance of writ in the nature of Certiorari for setting aside the order dated 06.04.2023 in Excise Revision Case No. 12 of 2023 whereby and where under the Learned Principal Secretary, Excise Department, Government of Bihar imposed penalty of Rs. 5,00,000/- (reducing it from Rs. 7,00,000/- to Rs. 5,00,000/-) against the petitioner for release of the confiscated premises and upheld the order of learned Collector-cum-District Magistrate, Rohtas, Sasaram dated 13.12.2022 in Excise confiscation case No. 320 of 2022 arising out of Sasaram (town) P.S. Case No. 161 of 2022 dated 28.02.2022 under Rule 12B of Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Rules, 2022.
(ii) For directing the respondent authorities to furnish the details pertaining to the basis of calculation while imposition of penalty against the petitioner as the same is in contravention of Sub clause 2 of Rule 12B of Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Rules, 2022 in the instant matter.
(iii) For passing of any order(s), directions(s) which this Hon'ble Court deems fit and proper.
5. In the confiscation order dated 13.12.2022, the Confiscating Authority has imposed fine of Rs. 7,00,000/-. Such imposition of penalty of Rs. 7,00,000/- is in the absence of reasoning. That apart, it is reliably learnt that the Collector is stated to have taken certain material information in respect of value of the subject matter of the premises and thereafter, proceeded to impose penalty of Rs. 7,00,000/-. Appellate authority confirmed the orders of confiscating authority. Thereafter, it was reduced to Rs. 5,00,000/- by the revisional authority.
6. We have perused the order dated 13.12.2022 read with Sub-rule (2) of Rule 12B of Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2021. Confiscating Authority’s order dated 13.08.2022 is not in terms of Sub-rule (2) of Rule 12B of Bihar Prohibition and Excise Rules, 2021. Therefore, impugned confiscation order and consequential order of appellate authority and revisional authority are set aside. Matter is remanded to the Confiscating Authority to re-determine the penalty after giving ample opportunity of hearing to the petitioner.
7. The above exercise shall be completed within a period of three months from the date of receipt of this order.
8. The Collector is hereby directed to re-assess the penalty in the light of Sub-rule (2) of Rule 12B of Bihar Prohibition and Excise Rules, 2021.
9. Accordingly, the writ petition stands disposed of.
10. Invariably we have come across identical orders being passed by the competent authority insofar as imposition of penalty under the confiscation proceedings without due consideration of Rule 12-B (2) of Bihar Prohibition and Excise Rules, 2021. Therefore, the competent authorities are hereby directed to take note of Sub-rule (2) of Rule 12 of Bihar Prohibition and Excise Rules, 2021 before determining the penalty.
11. Let a copy of this order be forwarded to the Additional Chief Secretary, Prohibition and Excise, Govt. of Bihar to guide the respective Collectors who are handling confiscation proceedings.
The court modified a confiscation order into a monetary penalty under the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, balancing legal enforcement and rights to property.
Penalty imposition must comply with statutory provisions; unauthorized penalties for vehicle seizure exceed legal authority and are impermissible.
Penalty for vehicle release in excise seizure cases must consider meagre liquor quantity, lack of owner involvement, and insurance value; full insured amount exorbitant without regular illicit use ev....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.