SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(Pat) 857

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
SANJAY KAROL, PARTHA SARTHY, JJ.
Ashutosh Kumar, Son of Sri Prabhash Chandra Bosh – Petitioner
Versus
The State of Bihar, through the Principal Secretary Food and Consumer Protection Department, Government of Bihar and Ors. - Respondents
Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.23420 of 2019
Decided On : 03-01-2023

Advocates Appeared:
For the Petitioner: Mr. Subhash Kumar Jha, Mr. Indrajeet Jha, Mr. Ranjan Kumar Jha.
For the Respondents: Mr. S.Raza Ahmad, Mr. Bijay Kumar Sinha, Mr. Shailendra Kumar Singh, Mr. Siddharth Harsh.

The importance of a reasoned and speaking order, compliance with principles of natural justice, and clarity on the amount due in certificate proceedings.

Headnote:

Judicial Review - Writ Application - Quashing of Certificate Proceedings

Fact of the Case:

The petitioner sought to quash the certificate proceedings and the order for warrant of arrest issued by the Certificate Officer, Banka, on the grounds of unreasoned order and lack of clarity on the amount due.

Finding of the Court:

The court quashed the impugned order and directed the petitioner to appear before the Certificate Officer, Banka for a fresh hearing, with specific directions for the officer to pass a reasoned and speaking order after complying with the principles of natural justice.

Issues: Unreasoned order, lack of clarity on the amount due, and violation of principles of natural justice.

Ratio Decidendi: The court emphasized the importance of a reasoned and speaking order, compliance with principles of natural justice, and the need for clarity on the amount due in certificate proceedings.

Final Decision: The impugned order was quashed, and specific directions were given for a fresh hearing and issuance of a reasoned order by the Certificate Officer, Banka.

JUDGMENT :

(Sanjay Karol, J.)

1. Heard learned counsel for the parties.

2. Petitioner has prayed for the following relief(s):-

    1. That this writ Application is being failed on behalf of the petitioner for quashing the entire certificate proceedings as far as relates to the petitioner arising out of certificate case no. 03 of 2016-17 including the order dated 30.07.2019 by which objection of the petitioner has been rejected and warrant of arrest has been issued against the petitioner by the Certificate Officer, Banka respondent No.-10. Without applying his judicial mind.

3. The impugned ten line order dated 30.07.2019 passed by Respondent No. 10, namely, the Certificate Officer, Banka cum Sub Divisional Officer, Banka in Certificate Case No. 03/16-17 (Annexure-4 series, Page-30) does not, in any manner, state the amount which is due and payable by the petitioner as a public demand. Also, what is the basis thereof is missing therein. In effect, it is a unreasoned order. Passing of the order entails both civil and penal consequences, for petitioner can be arrested, apart from paying the amount as demanded by the department without adjudication by the Adjudicating Authority.

4. As such, on this short ground alone, we quash and set aside the impugned order dated 30.07.2019 passed by Respondent No. 10, namely, the Certificate Officer, Banka cum Sub Divisional Officer, Banka in Certificate Case No. 03/16-17 (Annexure-4 series, Page-30) with the following directions:-

    (a) Petitioner shall appear before Respondent No. 10, namely, the Certificate Officer, Banka cum Sub Divisional Officer, Banka on 16th of January, 2023 at 10:30 A.M., on which date the said officer shall fix a date for hearing of the matter;

(b) Liberty reserved to the parties to place on record additional material(s) in support of their contentions;

(c) Petitioner shall fully cooperate in the proceedings;

(d) The said officer shall pass a fresh order assigning reasons within a period of four weeks thereafter, copy whereof be supplied to the petitioner;

(e) The officer concerned shall pass a reasoned and speaking order after complying with the principles of natural justice;

(f) All consequential orders shall also stand quashed;

(g) Liberty reserved to the petitioner to challenge the order in accordance with law;

5. The petition stands disposed of in the aforesaid terms.

6. Interlocutory Application(s), if any, shall stand disposed of.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top