SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(Pat) 915

SANDEEP KUMAR
Ram Kali Devi – Appellant
Versus
Gopal Tiwari – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Petitioners: M/s Jitendra Kishore Verma, Anjani Kumar, Ravi Raj, Shreyas Goyal, Sweta Raj.
For the Respondent: None.

ORDER

Learned counsel for the petitioners prays for and permission is granted to make necessary corrections in the prayer portion of the petition.

2. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners.

3. None appears for the respondents 1st Set/Intervenors despite vakalatnama having been filed on behalf of respondents 1st Set/Intervenors.

4. This application has been filed for quashing of order dated 13.03.2018 passed by learned Sub-Judge-III, Dalsingsarai, Samastipur by which learned Judge allowed the application of intervenor/respondents 1st Set for being added as a party in Title Suit No. 97 of 2014 under Order 1 Rule 10(2) C.P.C.

5. Learned counsel for the respondents 1st Set/Intervenors who had filed vakalatnama submits that the respondents 1st Set/Intervenors have taken the file and no objection from him.

6. It has been submitted by learned counsel for the petitioners that plaintiffs/petitioners have filed a Title Suit No.97 of 2014 for grant the decree of declaration of right, title and interest over the schedule-II lands of the plaint by declaring the sale deed executed by the defendant 3rd party in favour of defendant 1st party illegal and Revisional Survey Khatiyan no. 6,42,46,54 and 8

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top