SANDEEP KUMAR
Ram Kali Devi – Appellant
Versus
Gopal Tiwari – Respondent
ORDER
Learned counsel for the petitioners prays for and permission is granted to make necessary corrections in the prayer portion of the petition.
2. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners.
3. None appears for the respondents 1st Set/Intervenors despite vakalatnama having been filed on behalf of respondents 1st Set/Intervenors.
4. This application has been filed for quashing of order dated 13.03.2018 passed by learned Sub-Judge-III, Dalsingsarai, Samastipur by which learned Judge allowed the application of intervenor/respondents 1st Set for being added as a party in Title Suit No. 97 of 2014 under Order 1 Rule 10(2) C.P.C.
5. Learned counsel for the respondents 1st Set/Intervenors who had filed vakalatnama submits that the respondents 1st Set/Intervenors have taken the file and no objection from him.
6. It has been submitted by learned counsel for the petitioners that plaintiffs/petitioners have filed a Title Suit No.97 of 2014 for grant the decree of declaration of right, title and interest over the schedule-II lands of the plaint by declaring the sale deed executed by the defendant 3rd party in favour of defendant 1st party illegal and Revisional Survey Khatiyan no. 6,42,46,54 and 8
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.