Back
ASHUTOSH KUMAR, NANI TAGIA
Ramvinay Rai @ Vinay Rai – Appellant
Versus
State of Bihar – Respondent
Ashutosh Kumar, J.—We have heard Mr. Sheo Jee Mishra, learned Advocate for the appellants, Mr. Jai Prakash Verma, learned Advocate for the informant and Mr. Dilip Kumar Sinha, learned APP for the State.
2. The appellants, who are brothers amongst themselves, have been convicted under Sections 302, 120B and 201 of the Indian Penal Code vide judgment dated 04.05.2017 passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge-XIII, East Champaran, Motihari, in Sessions Trial No. 166 of 2015, arising out of Chiraiya P.S. Case No. 87 of 2014. By order dated 09.05.2017, they have been sentenced to undergo imprisonment for life for the offence under Sections 302/120B. They have been saddled with a fine of Rs.10,000/- in default of payment of which, the appellants have been directed to undergo S.I. for six months. With respect to offence under Section 201 of IPC, the appellants have been sentenced to undergo R.I. for three years, to pay a fine of Rs.5,000/- and in default of payment of fine to further suffer S.I. for three months.
3. The sentences have been ordered to run concurrently.
4. Kamlesh Kumar, a student studying in a Coaching Institute, was found dead in the field of one Bishwanath Rai. Accord
The court established that intention to kill can be inferred from the nature of the weapon used and the manner of the attack, affirming that the use of a deadly weapon in a violent context supports a....
The principle of benefit of doubt necessitates acquittal when the prosecution fails to prove guilt beyond a reasonable doubt, especially with inconsistent eyewitness testimony.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
