JUDGMENT :

ASHUTOSH KUMAR, J.

1. Heard Mr. Yogesh Chandra Verma, the learned senior advocate for the appellant/informant who is aggrieved by the judgment of acquittal of respondent no. 2, who has been represented here by Sri Mukesh Kumar, the learned advocate. We have also heard Mr. Dilip Kumar Sinha, the learned A.P.P. for the State.

2. By way of the present appeal, the appellant has challenged the acquittal of respondent no. 2 by the learned Additional Sessions Judge -1, Supaul vide judgment dated 20.07.2019 passed in Sessions Trial No. 101 of 2013 arising out of Balua Bazar P.S. Case No. 34/2012.

3. The respondent no. 2 is the husband of the deceased against whom charges were framed under Section 302 and 304B Indian Penal Code. The informant/appellant who has been examined as P.W. 4 had lodged the F.I.R. on 23.09.2012, alleging that he had married his daughter to the respondent no. 2 in the year 2006. Right since the marriage, he had been according all respect to the family of the appellant but on the exhortation of his parents and brother, the respondent no. 2 kept on demanding money every now and then. Uptill now, all the demands put up by respondent no. 2 had been fulfilled by hi