IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
RAJEEV RANJAN PRASAD, J.
Balbir Singh Beniwal Son of Late Late Nihal Singh Beniwal – Appellant
Versus
The State of Bihar – Respondent
Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.17111 of 2021
Decided on : 05-09-2023
Termination - Administrative Reason - Sexual Harassment of Women at Workplace Act 2013 - 3, 12, 16 - The court discussed the impugned office order, the preliminary inquiry report, and the principles of natural justice. It referred to the judgment in Dr. Vijayakumaran C.P.V. v. Central University of Kerala and Others (2020) 12 SCC 426, emphasizing that material amounting to stigma need not be contained in the termination order but might be contained in any document referred to in the termination order. The court found the impugned office order stigmatic and set it aside, reinstating the petitioner for the remainder of the period, but not entitled to any salary or emoluments for the period outside service.
Fact of the Case:
The petitioner, a retired academician and dairy scientist, was appointed as the Dean of Sanjay Gandhi Institute of Dairy Technology, Patna. Allegations were made against him, and the University terminated his service citing administrative reasons and ongoing inquiry by the Internal Complaint Committee under the Sexual Harassment of Women at Workplace Act 2013.
Finding of the Court:
The impugned office order was found stigmatic and set aside, reinstating the petitioner for the remainder of the period but without entitlement to any salary or emoluments for the period outside service.
Issues: The issues revolved around the termination of the petitioner's service, the ongoing inquiry by the Internal Complaint Committee, and the application of the principles of natural justice.
Ratio Decidendi: The court emphasized that material amounting to stigma need not be contained in the termination order but might be contained in any document referred to in the termination order. It found the impugned office order stigmatic and set it aside, reinstating the petitioner for the remainder of the period but without entitlement to any salary or emoluments for the period outside service.
Final Decision: The writ application was allowed to the extent that the impugned office order was set aside, reinstating the petitioner for the remainder of the period but without entitlement to any salary or emoluments for the period outside service.
JUDGMENT :
Heard Mr. P.N. Shahi, learned Senior Counsel assisted by Mr. Samir Kumar, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. Anjani Kumar, learned senior counsel assisted by Mr. Alok Kumar Rahi, learned counsel for the Bihar Animal Sciences University.
2. The petitioner in the present case is seeking the following reliefs:-
(ii) To issue an appropriate writ(s), order(s), direction(s) in the nature of writ of certiorari to quash the order dated 22.03.2021 issued by Vice Chancellor, Bihar Animal Sciences University, Bihar Veterinary College Campus, Patna by which he has been pleased to direct the petitioner to hand over Administrative Charges of post of Dean, Sanjay Gandhi Institute of Dairy Technology, Patna.
(iii) To issue an appropriate writ(s), order(s), direction(s) in the nature of writ of mandamus directing respondents to reinstate the petitioner for balance of period of his tenure as the charges against him remained unproved and the Enquiry was closed; (iv) To issue an appropriate writ(s), order(s), direction(s) in the nature of writ of mandamus directing the respondents to issue the character and experience certificate with apology letter to the petitioner for unwarranted and unjustified termination and also pay compensation as well as damages to compensate the financial loss, social and mental setbacks caused to him due to termination resulting into deprivation of means of livelihood for six months;
(v) Any other relief which the petitioner may deemed to be found entitled in the facts and circumstances of the case.”
Facts of the Present Case
3. The petitioner in the present case claims that he is widely acclaimed Academician and a Dairy Scientist. After serving the Haryana Agricultural University for about 30 years, the petitioner retired from service on attaining the age of superannuation. He came across the Employment Notice No. 12 of 2018 as contained in Annexure ‘P/1’ to the writ application.
4. The Employment Notice was issued by the Bihar Animal Sciences University (hereinafter referred to as the ‘University’) from eligible candidates for the post of Dean in the three constituent colleges of the University. The petitioner applied for the said post and was selected for the post of Dean, Sanjay Gandhi Institute of Dairy Technology, Patna. The offer of appointment of the petitioner is a part of Annexure ‘P/1’ to the writ application. According to the offer of appointment, the tenure of the post will be for five years or 65 years of age, whichever is earlier. His appointment is to be governed by the agreement to be executed between him and the University at the time of joining and the provisions of the Bihar Animal Sciences University revised from time to time will be applicable. Clause ‘3’ of the offer of appointment which is relevant for purpose of the present case is being reproduced hereunder for a ready reference:-
5. The petitioner states that the petitioner was a disciplined hard task master, therefore, he was not being liked by a group of unruly people who started hobnobbing with some persons of the Opposition parties of the State and their leaders. It is the case of the petitioner that on 18th of March, a member of the Opposition alleged in the Bihar Legislative Council that the Dean of the Sanjay Gandhi Institute of Dairy Technology was appointed because of his relation with the Vice Chancellor and
Dipti Prakash Banerjee v. Satyendra Nath Bose National Centre for Basic Sciences
Indra Pal Gupta v. Model Inter College
Pavanendra Narayan Verma v. Sanjay Gandhi PGI of Medical Sciences
Termination orders with allegations of misconduct require a formal inquiry and adherence to natural justice, even for contractual employees.
Termination under CCS (Temporary Service) Rules Rule 5(1) is punitive if founded on specific misconduct without formal enquiry, even if order appears simpliciter; requires reinstatement with liberty ....
Termination of a probationer must not cast stigma without due process; otherwise, it is deemed illegal and arbitrary.
Termination of a probationary employee requires a departmental inquiry if allegations of misconduct are made, and continued employment without formal disengagement results in deemed permanency.
A termination order based on allegations of misconduct without conducting a departmental inquiry is stigmatic and punitive in nature, requiring compliance with principles of natural justice.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.