SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

CHAKRADHARI SHARAN SINGH, RAJESH KUMAR VERMA
Piko Yadav @ Pinku Yadav S/o Sikandar Yadav – Appellant
Versus
State of Bihar – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellants : Surendra Singh, Praveen Kumar, Syed Masleh-Uddin Ashraf.
For the Respondents: Abhimanyu Sharma, Dilip Kumar Sinha.

JUDGMENT :

CHAKRADHARI SHARAN SINGH, J.

1. The appellants have preferred these appeals under Section 374(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure against the judgment of conviction dated 30.06.2015 and the order of sentence dated 04.07.2015 passed by the learned ad hoc Additional Sessions Judge-I, Bhagalpur, in Sessions Trial No. 342 of 2014/T.R. No. 527 of 2014 arising out of Bhagalpur Kotwali (Vishwavidalaya) P.S. Case No. 675 of 2013, whereby and whereunder the appellants have been convicted and sentenced as under:

Piko Yadav the appellant in Criminal Appeal (DB) No. 611 of 2015

Conviction under Section

Sentence

Imprisonment

Fine (Rs.)

In default of fine

Under Section 302/34, of the IPC

Imprisonment for life

10,000/-

SI for one year

 

Under Section 27 of the Arms Act

Simple Imprisonment for 3 years

2,000/-

SI for Five Months

Raju Yadav @ Rajesh the appellant in Criminal Appeal (DB) No. 620 of 2015

Under Section 302/34, of the IPC

Imprisonment for life

10,000/-

SI for one year

Under Section 27 of the Arms Act

Simple Imprisonment for 3 years

2,000/-

SI f

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top