Back
BIBEK CHAUDHURI
Sunil Pandit – Appellant
Versus
State of Bihar – Respondent
Bibek Chaudhuri, J. – The instant revision is directed against the judgment and order of affirmation passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge IIIrd Court at Samastipur on 28th June 2016, in Criminal Appeal No. 46 of 2011, whereby and whereunder the appellate Court maintained the order passed by the trial court, of conviction for the offence punishable under Sections 498A of the IPC and Section 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act and sentence of the petitioner to suffer imprisonment for three years and also to pay fine of Rs. 1,000/- with default clause for the offence under Section 498A of the IPC and rigorous imprisonment for one year with fine and default clause for the offence punishable under Section 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act.
2. Without going into the merit of the case and the finding of both the trial court as well as the court of appeal, this Court finds on perusal of the petition of complaint, on the basis of which, Complaint Case No. 172 of 2004 was registered that the present petitioner is not a relative of the husband of the complainant as provided in Section 498A of the IPC. It is clearly stated by the complainant in page 04 of the complaint that the present petit
The court modified the sentence to the time already served, considering the long duration since the alleged offences and the circumstances of the petitioners.
Insufficient evidence regarding dowry demands and cruelty led to the acquittal of the accused under Section 498A IPC, emphasizing the need for corroborative testimony.
Cruelty – Non-production of any injury report and non-examination of doctor is also fatal to complainant’s case.
Revisional courts must ensure substantial justice; lack of specific evidence in dowry cases warrants setting aside conviction under Section 498A.
The court acquitted the accused due to insufficient evidence establishing dowry demands and related charges, highlighting the need for clarity and consistency in testimonies.
The court established that the application of the Probation of Offenders Act must consider the nature of the offence and that procedural requirements, such as obtaining a probation officer's report, ....
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
