RAJIV ROY
Sri Yamuna Tiwari – Appellant
Versus
State of Bihar – Respondent
Rajiv Roy, J. – The question that has been raised in the present petition is as to whether the anticipatory bail granted to the opposite parties herein need to be cancelled in view of the averment by the petitioner that the process under Section 83 of the Cr.P.C. was executed by the Police on 26.02.2024 which was suppressed by the opposite parties herein when they approached the High Court for the grant of anticipatory bail.
2. Chiraiya P.S. Case no. 218 of 2022 was instituted under Sections 341, 323, 307, 354, 379, 504 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code on 09.05.2022 by the informant, Yamuna Tiwari @ Braj Bihari Tiwari.
3. The allegation in the FIR is that on 07.05.2022, as the informant’s son Surendra Tiwari objected Dhrup Narayan Tiwari who had started construction on a government land, his son, Sonu Tiwari gave ‘khanti’ blow on his head, was badly injured and collapsed on the ground. When the informant’s younger son and daughter-in-law came to his rescue, the allegation against Dhrup Narayan Tiwari is of giving ‘iron rod’ blow to the informant’s younger son, Upendra Tiwari. The allegation against the opposite party no. 2 to 4 as also six others is/are of assaulting the informant’s d
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.