Sanjeet Yadav, Son of Sri Arvind Yadav vs State of Bihar

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

2023 Supreme(Pat) 1319

VIPUL M. PANCHOLI, CHANDRA SHEKHAR JHA
Sanjeet Yadav, Son of Sri Arvind Yadav – Appellant
Versus
State of Bihar – Respondent

Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant :Mr. Ajay Kumar Thakur, Advocate, Ms. Vaishvavi Singh, Advocate
Ms. Kiran Kumari, Advocate
For the Respondent: Mr. Sujit Kumar Singh, APP For the Informant :Mr. Vishwa Ranjan Choudhary, Advocate

JUDGMENT :

Chandra Shekhar Jha, J.

Heard learned counsel Mr. Ajay Kumar Thakur appearing on behalf of the appellants, learned counsel Mr. Vishwa Ranjan Choudhary appearing on behalf of the informant and learned Additional Public Prosecutor Mr. Sujit Kumar Singh appearing on behalf of the State.

2. Present appeal preferred U/s 374(2) of the Criminal Procedure Code (Cr.P.C. challenging the impugned judgment of conviction dated 23.08.2018 and order of sentence dated 28.08.2018 passed by the learned Exclusive Special Judge, SC/ST, Gaya in S.C./S.T. Trial No. 43/2018 arising out of Neemchak Bathani P.S. Case No. 95/2017, where the appellants/accused have been convicted and sentenced as under:-

IN CRIMINAL APPEAL (DB) NO. 1152 of 2018
Appellant’s Name	Conviction under Sections	Sentence
Appellant’s Name	Conviction under Sections	Imprisonment	Fine (Rs.	In default of fine
Sanjeet Yadav	376-D of the Indian Penal Code	20 years	20,000/-	Rigorous Imprisonment of 3 months
Hawa@Santosh Yadav@Hawa Yadav	376-D of the Indian Penal Code	20 years	20,000/- Rigorous	Imprisonment of 3 months
Vikash Yadav	376-D of the Indian Penal Code	20 years	20,000/-	Rigorous Imprisonment of 3 mo

Click Here to Read the rest of this document

2023 Supreme(Pat) 1319

VIPUL M. PANCHOLI, CHANDRA SHEKHAR JHASanjeet Yadav, Son of Sri Arvind Yadav – AppellantVersusState of Bihar – Respondent

Cases Referred (13)

VIPUL M. PANCHOLI, CHANDRA SHEKHAR JHA
Sanjeet Yadav, Son of Sri Arvind Yadav – Appellant
Versus
State of Bihar – Respondent