IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CHAKRADHARI SHARAN SINGH, G. ANUPAMA CHAKRAVARTHY, JJ.
The State of Bihar – Appellant
Versus
Deva Nand Singh, Son of Ramdev Singh – Respondent
Death Reference No.2 of 2022, CRIMINAL APPEAL (DB) No. 241 of 2022, CRIMINAL APPEAL (DB) No. 278 of 2022, CRIMINAL APPEAL (DB) No. 279 of 2022
Decided on : 30-11-2023
DEATH PENALTY - MURDER AND CONSPIRACY - Cr.P.C. Section 366, IPC Sections 302, 201, 120B - The court discussed the provisions of the Code of Criminal Procedure (Cr.P.C.) regarding death references and appeals against conviction, particularly Section 366 for confirmation of death sentences and Section 374(2) for appeals against conviction. The court also analyzed the Indian Penal Code (IPC) sections related to murder (302), concealment of evidence (201), and criminal conspiracy (120B). The interpretations of these sections were pivotal in assessing the sufficiency of evidence and the nature of the crime, ultimately leading to the conclusion that the prosecution failed to establish the guilt of the accused beyond reasonable doubt.
Fact of the Case:
The appellants were convicted for the murder of two young lovers, allegedly due to familial opposition to their relationship. The prosecution's case was based on circumstantial evidence, including a confessional statement from a co-accused, Rajiv Kumar, who claimed to have witnessed the murders. The deceased were found hanging from a tree, and the prosecution argued it was a case of honor killing.
Finding of the Court:
The court found that the prosecution's evidence was largely circumstantial and insufficient to prove the guilt of the appellants beyond a reasonable doubt. The confessional statement of Rajiv Kumar was deemed inadmissible and not a true confession, as it did not admit guilt or lead to the discovery of any facts. The court noted the lack of direct evidence and the presence of hearsay witnesses, which weakened the prosecution's case.
Issues: Whether the prosecution proved the charges of murder and conspiracy against the appellants beyond a reasonable doubt, and whether the confessional statement of Rajiv Kumar could be considered admissible evidence.
Ratio Decidendi: The court emphasized that in cases based on circumstantial evidence, all links in the chain of evidence must be established. The absence of direct evidence, reliance on hearsay, and the inadmissibility of the co-accused's confessional statement led to the conclusion that the prosecution had not met its burden of proof.
Final Decision: The court set aside the trial court's judgment of conviction and acquitted all appellants of the charges under the IPC, including the death sentence for Deva Nand Singh. The appeals were allowed, and the death reference was answered accordingly.
JUDGMENT :
CHAKRADHARI SHARAN SINGH, J.
As the appellant Deva Nand Singh has been sentenced to death, a reference has been made by the Trial Court for confirmation of the said sentence giving rise to Death Reference No. 02 of 2022 under Section 366 of the Cr.P.C. As the aforesaid Death Reference and all the criminal appeals arise out of the same impugned judgment of conviction and the order of sentence passed by the Trial Court, they have been heard together and are being disposed of by the present common judgment and order. Hearing of these appeals have been expedited because of the death sentence imposed by the Trial Court.
2. These appeals have been preferred by the appellants under Section 374(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, putting to challenge a judgment of conviction dated 22.02.2022 and an order of sentence dated 28.02.2022, passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge-1, Rosera, Samastipur in Sessions Trial No. 261 of 2016, 227 of 2018 and 388 of 2018, CIS No. 97 of 2016, 946 of 2017 and 353 of 2018, arising out of Bibhutipur P.S. Case No. 223 of 2015, whereby the appellants have been convicted and sentenced as under:-
|
| CRIMINAL APPEAL (DB) No. 241 of 2022 | |||
| Appellant | Penal Provision | Sentence | ||
| Imprisonment | Fine (Rs.) | In default of fine | ||
| Gauri Kant Mahto | 302/34 of the IPC | R.I. for life | 25,000/- | SI for one year |
| 302/120B of the IPC | R.I. for life | 25,000/- | SI for one year | |
| 201/34 of the IPC | RI for three years | 10,000/- | SI for three months | |
|
| CRIMINAL APPEAL (DB) No. 278 of 2022 | |||
| Appellant | Penal Provision | Sentence | ||
| Imprisonment | Fine (Rs.) | In default of fine | ||
| Sudhir Kumr Singh | 302/34 of the IPC | R.I. for life | 25,000/- | SI for one year |
| 302/120B of the IPC | R.I. for life | 25,000/- | SI for one year | |
| 201/34 of the IPC | RI for three years | 10,000/- | SI for three months | |
|
| CRIMINAL APPEAL (DB) No. 279 of 2022 | |||
| Appellant | Penal Provision | Sentence | ||
| Imprisonment | Fine (Rs.) | In default of fine | ||
| Deva Nand Singh | 302/120B of the IPC | Death Sentence | X | X |
| 201 of the IPC | RI for three years | 10,000/- | SI for three months | |
3. It is the prosecution's case that two young persons, deeply in love with each other were killed by the appellants as they were opposed to their relationship. A village Chowkidar Krishnadeo Paswan (PW-5) is the informant of the concerned Bibhutipur P.S. Case No. 223 of 2015, whose fardbeyan is the basis for registration of the said F.I.R. According to his fardbeyan he learnt on 06.11.2015 in the morning that dead bodies of a boy and a girl were hanging from a banyan tree at Kapan Chaur. On reaching the said place, he noticed two bodies hanging from one of the branches of banyan tree. A mobile phone was also found near the root of the tree. After he circulated the information, many people gathered there and identified the said dead bodies. The girl, whose dead body was found hanging, was the niece of the appellants Sudhir Kumar Singh and Deva Nand Singh. The Chowkidar (the informant) suspected it to be a case of murder, whereafter the dead bodies were hanged for hiding evidence. The said fardbeyan was recorded by the S.H.O., Chaturvedi Sudhir Kumar (PW-9) at 7:30 AM at the place where the dead bodies were found. Inquest report was prepared. Seizure list was also prepared in respect of seizure of a Nokia mobile phone with two SIMs. The FIR was registered against unknown. The dead bodies were sent for postmortem examination. The following antemortem injuries were found on the person of the deceased Deepak Kumar :-
(2) A postmortem ligature size about 4"X1" in front and both sides of neck (3) No external sign of injury was found (4) Abdominal distortion
Internally :-(1) All viscera were congested including brain (2) No vital reaction was found on dissection of nose below the ligature marks (3) No bruising or haematoma was found below the ligature mark (4) About 250
Haricharan Kurmi v. State of Bihar (AIR 1964 SC 1184)
Narayan Swami Vs. Emperor (AIR 1939 PC 47)
State (NCT of Delhi) v. Navjot Sandhu
Surinder Kumar Khanna v. Directorate of Revenue Intelligence reported in (2018) 8 SCC 271
The judgment establishes that a conviction based solely on circumstantial evidence requires a complete chain of evidence linking the accused to the crime, and that confessions made to police officers....
Confessions made voluntarily and without pressure under Section 164 of Cr.P.C. are admissible as evidence.
Extra-judicial confessions require corroborative evidence to ensure reliability; circumstantial evidence must present a complete chain connecting the accused to the crime without reasonable doubt.
The main legal point established in the judgment is that confessional statements made to a police officer are inadmissible under Section 25 of the Evidence Act, and no part of it is admissible under ....
The court ruled that circumstantial evidence and confessions were insufficient to establish guilt beyond reasonable doubt, leading to the acquittal of the appellants.
In criminal cases based on circumstantial evidence, all circumstances must be proven beyond reasonable doubt to establish guilt, and inconsistencies in witness testimonies can lead to acquittal.
Circumstantial evidence – Where a case rests squarely on circumstantial evidence, inference of guilt can be justified only when all incriminating facts and circumstances are found to be incompatible ....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.