Back
RAJEEV RANJAN PRASAD
Mayank Kumar, S/o. Vinay Kumar Pal – Appellant
Versus
State of Bihar through Principal Secretary, Home Department, Government of Bihar – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
Rajeev Ranjan Prasad, J.
Since the serial number of parties in the respondent column have been incorrectly numbered, learned counsel for the petitioner is permitted to make necessary correction in the petition.
2. This writ application has been filed seeking a direction restraining respondent no. 6 from harassing the petitioner in the garb of Mahila P.S. Case No. 102 of 2022 and further to ensure a fair investigation in the matter as also to grant appropriate compensation to the petitioner and for grant of any other suitable relief/reliefs for which the petitioner may be found entitled to in the eyes of law.
Brief facts of the case
3. The petitioner is an employee of the State Bank of India at Exhibition Road Branch, Patna. It is his case that he came in contact with respondent no. 8, who was posted as a Female Constable in Patna District Force. They became good friends and got involved in a love affair. On 19.09.2020, the private respondent approached Mahila Police Station, Gardanibagh, Patna and lodged a complaint alleging that she has been sexually exploited by the petitioner on the pretext of marriage.
4. It is further case of the petitioner that on having been pressurized
The court established that the failure to communicate a court order does not automatically imply wrongful arrest, and the burden of proof lies on the petitioner to demonstrate that the arrest was in ....
(1) A fit case to exercise the powers under Articles 226 and 227 of Constitution of India read with Section 482 of Cr.P.C.(2) Very entrustment of the investigation into the matter and continuing the ....
Law of bail deals with two complicating interests, i.e. societal interest to cure hazards of crime and to avoid repeating of the same and on the other hand principle of criminal jurisprudence referri....
An order of anticipatory bail should not be “blanket” in sense that it should not enable accused to commit further offences and claim relief of indefinite protection from arrest.
The court affirmed that police can investigate non-cognizable offences alongside cognizable ones, emphasizing the need for careful scrutiny of complaints in family disputes.
The execution of a non-bailable warrant must be based on accurate identification to prevent wrongful detention, but actions taken in good faith under a valid warrant do not constitute an abuse of pow....
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
