IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
P. B. Bajanthri, Alok Kumar Pandey, JJ.
Manish Raj @ Mani Kumar @ Manish Kumar Son Of Manoj Kumar Vidyarthy - Petitioner
Versus
The State Of Bihar Through Home Secretary and ors. – Respondents
Criminal Writ Jurisdiction Case No.724 of 2024
Decided On : 06-05-2024
HABEAS CORPUS - ILLEGAL CONFINEMENT - The court addressed the petitioner's request for a writ of Habeas Corpus, asserting that his wife, a major, was illegally confined. The court examined the victim's age through various documents, concluding she was a minor, which influenced the decision to dismiss the petition, affirming the legality of her confinement in a Short Stay Home for her protection.
Fact of the Case:
The petitioner sought a writ of Habeas Corpus for his wife, claiming she was illegally confined despite being a major. The petitioner presented a birth certificate indicating she was of legal age, while the State provided evidence suggesting she was a minor based on school records.
Finding of the Court:
The court found that the victim was indeed a minor, supported by school admission records and a mark sheet. The victim's mother expressed fear regarding her daughter's safety, and the petitioner had a criminal background, leading the court to conclude that there was no illegal confinement.
Issues: Whether the victim was a major or minor at the time of the petition and if her confinement was illegal.
Ratio Decidendi: The court determined that the victim's age was critical in assessing the legality of her confinement. The evidence presented by the State established her as a minor, which justified her placement in a protective facility.
Final Decision: The court dismissed the petition, ruling that the confinement of the victim was lawful and not illegal.
JUDGMENT :
Alok Kumar Pandey, J.
In the instant petition, the petitioner has prayed for the following relief(s):-
(ii) For issuance of an appropriate writ/order/direction to the respondents granting any other relief or reliefs for which the petitioner is found entitled.
2. As per statutory requirement, the name of victim as well as relative has not been disclosed to protect her identity and prestige.
3. Briefly stated the facts of the case is that victim is said to have been taken out by the petitioner with bad intention and present writ petition has been filed seeking direction to release the petitioner's wife/victim from illegal confinement as she is major.
4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that victim, who is claimed to be wife of the petitioner, is major and she is illegally confined by the respondents authority in Short Stay Home (Alpawas Grih). Learned counsel further submitted that petitioner has solemnized his marriage with major girl (victim) and he is entitled to live with his wife. Learned counsel further submitted that as per birth certificate issued by the Registrar (Birth and Death), Nagar Parishad, Jehanabad, date of birth of victim is 14.08.2004.
5. Learned counsel for the State submitted that as per School Admission Register, date of birth of victim is 04.08.2007. Learned counsel further submitted that mark sheet of victim issued by Bihar School Examination Board, Patna clearly indicates that date of birth of the victim is 04.08.2007 and on the basis of said certificate age of the victim is less than 18 years. In this way, victim is minor.
6. From perusal of the material available on record, it is quite clear that the victim is still minor. Furthermore, in pursuance of order dated 24.04.2024 passed by this court, the victim's mother appeared before the court and she stated that she is afraid of keeping her daughter. Petitioner is having criminal antecedent. From perusal of the material available on record, it is evident that victim is minor and her mother is not ready to keep the victim with her. Presently, victim has been kept in Short Stay Home (Alpawas Grih). Hence, petitioner has not made out a case as there is no illegal confinement of the victim.
7. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances as well as material available on record, the present Cr.W.J.C. is not maintainable and same stands dismissed.
The legal principle established is that the age of the victim is paramount in determining the legality of confinement, particularly in cases involving potential harm and protection of minors.
Writ of Habeas Corpus cannot be maintained for a minor involved in an ongoing police case.
The right of a major individual to make their own choices and enjoy freedom as permitted by law.
Victims' rights to liberty and personal choice prevail over custodial interventions, even in minor cases, when they express their desire to live with their spouse.
A writ of habeas corpus for production of a person under detention/stay based on a judicial order passed by a competent court is not maintainable.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.