SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(Pat) 527

PURNENDU SINGH
Mahendra Prasad Chauhan – Appellant
Versus
State of Bihar – Respondent


Advocates:
For the Petitioner: M/s Satya Ranjan Sinha, Seema Kumari, Dhananjay Kumar.
For the Respondents: Mr. Mithlesh Kumar Singh.

Purnendu Singh, J.—Heard Mr. Satya Ranjan Sinha, along with Ms. Seema Kumari and Mr. Dhananjay Kumar, learned counsels appearing on behalf of the petitioner and Mr. Mithlesh Kumar Singh, learned counsel for the respondents.

2. Petitioner has inter alia prayed for following reliefs in the paragraphs No.1 of the writ petition:—

I. To issue Rule of Certiorari for quashing the illegal order so far as against the petitioner of commandant, Bihar Military Police-2, Dehri vide Memo no.4907/R,ka. Dated 8.11.2011 contained in Annexure -3.

II. To grant all the reliefs which was granted to Binod Gond.

III. To grant all benefit such as promotion, salary and other allowances etc. in view of the fact that by the judgment of Hon’ble High Court setting aside dismissal of the petitioner.

IV. To grant any other relief/reliefs which the petitioner found entitled in the facts and circumstances of the case.”

3. The petitioner has claimed that he was appointed on 27.01.1991, but, the same has been denied by the respondents in their counter affidavit stating therein that date of appointment of the petitioner on the post of Constable in B.M.P.-9, Jamalpur is 18.01.1991 and thereafter the petitioner was posted at

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top