SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(Pat) 546

ANJANI KUMAR SHARAN
Satya Prakash – Appellant
Versus
State of Bihar – Respondent


Advocates:
For the Petitioner: Mr. Ram Sagar Singh.
For the Respondent: Mr. Madanjeet Kumar, GP-20.

Anjani Kumar Sharan, J.—Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the respondent State.

2. By filing this petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the petitioner seeks issuance of an appropriate writ/direction for commanding the respondents to pay salary which is withheld with effect from August, 2018 and suspension allowance from 7.9.2019 along with other consequential benefits including benefits of ACP/Pravaran Vetanman.

3. During pendency of this writ petition, an interlocutory application, bearing I.A. No.1 of 2024 was filed by the petitioner to amend the prayer portion, which was allowed vide order dated 15.07.2024.

4. The brief fact emanates from the case record is that the petitioner was appointed as Assistant Teacher in Project Sadholal Shah Arya Girls Inter School, Akbarpur, Nawada (hereinafter referred to as the “School”) on 26.12.1985 vide appointment letter dated 22.12.1985. The petitioner’s school was taken over as a second phase project school. The petitioner was graduate at the time of his initial appointment and, subsequently, he completed his Bachelor of Education (in short, B.Ed.) Training course in session 1988-89 and according

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top