SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(Pat) 605

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Anjani Kumar Sharan, J.
Md. Aslam Ali Quadri alias Md. Aslam Ali Kadri Son of Haroon Rasid Ansari – Petitioner
Versus
The State of Bihar through the Principal Secretary, Department of Primary Education and ors. – Respondents
Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.10380 of 2019
Decided On : 08-05-2024

Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Petitioner: Mr.Jagdish Prasad Singh, Adv.
For the Respondent: Mr. Shashi Shekhar Tiwary AC to AAG, Mr.M.S.Hoda, Adv., Mr.Anuj Kumar, Adv.

The District Teachers Employment Appellate Authority lacks jurisdiction to review decisions made by the Block Development Officer, reaffirming the principle of jurisdiction in employment matters.

Headnote:(A) Bihar Panchayat Teachers Employment Rules, 2006 - Jurisdiction of District Teachers Employment Appellate Authority - The State Appellate Authority quashed the order of the District Teachers Employment Appellate Authority on grounds of lack of jurisdiction, directing fresh counselling for appointment. (Paras 6, 12)

(B) Writ Jurisdiction - The court upheld the decision of the State Appellate Authority, affirming that the District Appellate Authority lacked jurisdiction to review the B.D.O.'s order. (Paras 13)

Facts of the case:
The petitioner challenged the cancellation of his appointment as a Panchayat Teacher, which was quashed by the State Appellate Authority, leading to a fresh counselling directive.

Findings of Court:
The court found no illegality in the State Appellate Authority's order, confirming its jurisdictional basis.

Issues: The main issues included the jurisdiction of the District Teachers Employment Appellate Authority and the validity of the appointment process.

Ratio Decidendi: The court ruled that the District Teachers Employment Appellate Authority had no jurisdiction to review the B.D.O.'s order, as established in prior case law.

Result: Writ application dismissed.

JUDGMENT :

Anjani Kumar Sharan, J.

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned counsel for the State and learned counsel for the private respondent.

2. The petitioner has filed this writ application for issuance of an appropriate writ or direction in the nature of certiorari for setting aside order dated 01.04.2019 in Appeal No.144/2018 passed by State Appellate Authority, Patna whereby and where under order dated 08.12.2009 in Case No.674 of 2009 passed by District Teachers Employment Appellate Authority, Darbhanga has been quashed on the ground of lack of jurisdiction and employment of the Private Respondent (petitioner) has been cancelled and Panchayat Employment Unit has been directed to hold fresh counselling inviting appellant (respondent no.7) private respondent (petitioner) and other candidates above them in merit list intimating the date, time and venue of counselling. Petitioner also prays for an appropriate order for confirming the order dated 08.12.2009 passed by District Panchayat Teachers Employment Appellate Authority, Darbhanga in Case No.674/2009.

3. The brief facts of the case is that pursuant to advertisement in the year, 2006, petitioner (Urdu) and others applied for appointment as Panchayat Teacher in Gram Panchayat, Baghouni within Baheri Panchayat. Total 14 posts of teachers were notified by advertisement out of which 10 seats were for Hindi Teacher and 4 seats were for Urdu Teacher. The respondent Panchayat prepared merit list on 30.09.2006 according to marks of applicants. Petitioner was at serial no.37 whereas private respondent was at serial no.36 having marks as 60.54% and 60.33% respectively. Respondents issued 1st panel for which counselling was done on 18.12.2006 and 20 persons including serial no.36 were called for counselling including respondent no.7. The persons who completed their counselling on 18.12.2006 were allotted school on the basis of counselling and consent on 18.12.2006. Only 6 persons turned up for certificate verification and to submit consent accordingly, they were issued joining letter on 19.12.2006. Remaining 8 seats were declared vacant and accordingly 2nd panel was prepared for 8 persons including petitioner on 10.01.2007 The petitioner was in 2nd panel and after counselling, verification of certificate and consent, respondent Panchayat issued appointment letter to the petitioner vide letter no.1 dated 16.01.2007 and accordingly, petitioner submitted joining on 16.01.2007 itself.

4. The petitioner was then transferred on 03.04.2008 to another Primary School. Thereafter, all of a sudden on 23.01.2008, respondent no.7 submitted application to respondent Block Development Officer, Baheri, who without asking show cause to petitioner and hearing him, passed order dated 04.04.2008 behind the back of the petitioner, whereby and where under selection of petitioner was cancelled and Authorities were directed to appoint respondent no.7 though the order was issued through memo no.1059 dated 08.05.2008 (annexure-3 to the writ petition).

5. Aggrieved by the same, petitioner filed CWJC No.10269 of 2008 challenging memo no.1059 dated 09.05.2008 and the said writ application was disposed of by this Court with liberty to approach District Appellate Authority. In view of the order dated 28.10.2009 passed in CWJC No.10269/2008, the petitioner approached the District Teachers Appellate Authority, Darbhanga through Appeal No.674/2009 and the District Appellate Authority by its order dated 08.12.2009 set aside the order dated 04.04.2008 and directed to reinstate the petitioner and petitioner was reinstated and since then, he is working.

6. The respondent no.7, then challenged the order dated 08.12.2009 before this Court through CWJC No.2162 of 2010 which was disposed of by order dated 13.11.2017 with liberty to approach the Bihar State Appellate Authority, Patna. Thereafter, the respondent no.7 filed Appeal No.144 of 2018 before the State Appellate Authority, which, by order dated 01.04.2019 allow

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top