Nearly Decade-Long Delay in Patnitop Illegal Construction PIL Appalls J&K&L High Court; Directs PDA CEO to Join Proceedings
07 Mar 2026
Punjab & Haryana HC Denies Anticipatory Bail in Murder via Humiliation Case: Sections 103(1) & 3(5) BNS
07 Mar 2026
Employees Under CCS Pension Rules Excluded from PG Act Section 2(e) Gratuity: Delhi HC Upholds Forfeiture on Resignation
07 Mar 2026
Security Deposit Forfeiture Without Show-Cause Notice Violates Natural Justice: Himachal Pradesh High Court
07 Mar 2026
S.202 CrPC Inquiry Not Mandatory for Public Servant Complaints If Accused Outside Jurisdiction: Supreme Court
09 Mar 2026
Professor MP Singh: Shaper of Constitutional Discourse
09 Mar 2026
Supreme Court Orders No-Fault Vaccine Compensation Policy
11 Mar 2026
Delhi Sessions Court Upholds Conviction Under Sections 354, 354A IPC on Victim's Sole Reliable Testimony Despite No CCTV
11 Mar 2026
Kerala HC Seeks Dileep Response in 2017 Assault Appeal
11 Mar 2026
Back
Next 
PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH
Dadan Singh @ Dadan Yadav – Appellant
Versus
Directorate of Enforcement – Respondent
Headnote: Read headnote
Prabhat Kumar Singh, J.—This is an application for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner in connection with Special Trial No. (PMLA) Case No. 08 of 2021, arising out of ECIR No. ECIR/PTZO/10/2014 dated 13.05.2014 instituted for offences punishable under Section 4 of the Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002 (for short “PMLA”).
2. The prosecution case is that on the basis of F.I.R. No. 43/2006 dated 12.11.2006 and supplementary Charge-sheet No.62/07 dated 21.10.2007 filed by Koransarai P.S. Buxar forwarded by the S.P. Buxar, Bihar vide his Letter No 6192 dated 16.11.2013, an investigation was initiated by the Enforcement Directorate, Patna Zonal Office, Patna under the provisions of PMLA, 2002. In the supplementary charge-sheet, Sri Dadan Singh and Smt. Usha Singh were made accused under Sections 188, 384, 420, 120B I.P.C. and under Sections 25(1-b), 26, 35. 29. 30 of the Arms Act. In the FIR, it is alleged that one Scorpio having Registration No.DL-9CG-9596 was seized on 12.11.2006 during Panchayat Election and in the said vehicle two Aarakshi who were bodyguard of Dadan Singh, MLA and two other people namely Bhim Ram and Sanjay Ku
Once cognizance is taken under the PMLA, the Special Court lacks jurisdiction to arrest the accused, and bail matters must align with the Criminal Procedure Code provisions.
The mandatory conditions under Section 45 of PMLA for granting anticipatory bail were not satisfied, emphasizing economic offences' serious nature.
Anticipatory bail – Provision under Section 438 of Cr.P.C. cannot be invoked to protect accused from his apprehension of being taken to custody on his appearance by orders of Court.
The stringent conditions set by Section 45 of the P.M.L. Act for granting bail in money laundering cases were central to the court's decision.
The gravity of economic offences, potential influence on witnesses and evidence, and the failure to satisfy the twin conditions for bail under Section 45 of the PMLA were central to the court's decis....
An individual can be prosecuted under the PMLA, even if not directly involved in the scheduled offence, and the gravity of economic offences needs to be considered in the matter of bail. The court al....
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
Listen Article