SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(Pat) 898

ARUN KUMAR JHA
Devendra Singh – Appellant
Versus
Kailash Prasad – Respondent


Advocates:
For the Petitioner: M/s Jitendra Prasad Singh, Abhishek.
For the Respondents: M/s Keshav Shrivastava, Sr. Adv., Arvind Kumar Verma, Tushar Anand.

Arun Kumar Jha, J.—The instant petition has been filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India by the petitioner for setting aside the order dated 16.01.2017 passed by the learned Sub Judge 2nd, Kaimur at Bhabhua in Execution Case No. 05 of 1996 whereby and whereunder the learned Executing Court directed the judgment debtor to pay Rs.1,73,920/- to the decree holder as mesne profits.

2. Briefly stated, the facts of the case are that the respondent no. 1/respondent 1st set was the plaintiff in Title Suit No. 64 of 1986 and he filed a suit for recovery of possession over the suit land as well as for mesne profits. It has been pleaded by the plaintiff that the defendants were in need of money for purchase of tractor and they executed three sale deeds on 31.10.1983 with respect to suit property as mentioned in Schedule ‘Ka’ of the plaint for Rs.15,000/- but only part payment of Rs.5,000/- was made at the time of execution of the sale deed. Subsequently, the plaintiff paid remaining consideration amount of Rs.10,000/- but possession of the property was not delivered by the defendants and as such the plaintiff filed the title suit seeking relief of recovery of possession as well as

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top