SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(Pat) 895

MOHIT KUMAR SHAH
Devendra Kumar Singh – Appellant
Versus
State of Bihar – Respondent


Advocates:
For the Petitioner: Mr. Gajendra Kumar Singh.
For the Respondents: Mr. Kumar Pankaj, AC to SC-5.

Mohit Kumar Shah, J.—The present writ petition has been filed for quashing the order dated 14.8.2014, passed by the Assistant Inspector General Registration, Saran Division, Chapra, i.e. the Respondent No. 5, in Stamp Case No. 15 of 2013, whereby and whereunder the petitioner has been directed to deposit a sum of Rs. 18,120/- on the head of deficit stamp duty, apart from 10% penalty i.e. a sum of Rs. 1,820/-, totalling to a sum of Rs. 19,940/-. The petitioner has also challenged the appellate order dated 20.12.2019, passed by the learned Court of Commissioner, Saran Division, Chapra, i.e. the Respondent No. 2, in Stamp Appeal Case No. 228 of 2018, whereby and whereunder the appeal filed by the petitioner has been dismissed.

2. The brief facts of the case, according to the petitioner, are that the petitioner purchased a piece of land, ad-measuring 1 Katha, 8 dhur, appertaining to Khata No. 144, Plot No. 356, situated at Village-Fuchati Khurd, P.S.-Ekma, District-Saran, by a registered sale-deed, which was executed on 19.1.2013 and the same was registered by the office of the Sub-Registrar, Ekma, after payment of the requisite registration charges and stamp duty. It is stated by the l

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top