SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(Pat) 868

ANIL KUMAR SINHA
Intekhab Alam – Appellant
Versus
State of Bihar – Respondent


Advocates:
For the Petitioner: Mr. Ashhar Mustafa.
For the Resp.-State : M/s Kumar Alok, SC 7, Rakesh Kumar, AC to SC 7.

Anil Kumar Sinha, J.—The present application has been filed for issuance of a writ in the nature of mandamus commanding the respondents to fix the salary of the petitioner in furtherance of resolution no. 1830 dated 11.08.2015 after granting him pay protection as per the notification no. 429 dated 22.06.2012 under clause 8.

2. The facts of the case in short is that the petitioner was initially appointed as Panchayat Teacher on 05.02.2007 at Primary School, Madhubani Tole, Panchayat:- Bakhri, Block- Bathnaha, District- Sitamarhi. The Education Department issued a notification no. 429 dated 22.06.2012 in exercise of power under Rule 17 of the Bihar Panchayat Primary Teachers (Appointment and Service Condition) Rules, 2012 and Bihar Nagar Nikay Primary Teacher (Appointment and Service Condition) Rules, 2012 for appointment of Teachers in primary schools in the year 2012-2013. Clause 8 of the said notification prescribes that previously employed teachers, who have passed the TET examination can also apply for fresh appointment after getting their application duly forwarded from the first appointing authority. It also provides that in such case, second appointment shall be treated as fir

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top