SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(Pat) 916

HARISH KUMAR
Pawan Kumar – Appellant
Versus
State of Bihar – Respondent


Advocates:
For the Petitioner: Mr. Abhinav Srivastava.
For the Respondents: Mr. Rajan.

Harish Kumar, J.—This Court has heard Mr. Abhinav Srivastava, learned Advocate for the petitioner and Mr. Rajan, learned Advocate representing the State.

2. The petitioner, who superannuated on 30.11.2015 from the post of Joint Commissioner, Commercial Taxes of the State Government, has preferred the present writ petition seeking quashing of the notification contained in Memo No. 6061 dated 28.11.2018 issued by the Deputy Secretary to the Government in the Department of Commercial Taxes, Bihar, Patna by which 25% of the 90% of the provisional pension for the period of five years has been deducted in terms of Rule 139 of the Bihar Pension Rules, 1950, as the services of the petitioner have not been found to be satisfactory. The petitioner also sought a direction upon the respondent authorities to ensure the payment of gratuity and leave encashment along with other admissible benefits, upon his being superannuated on 30.11.2015, as there was neither any departmental proceeding/judicial proceeding pending against him nor there is any other valid reason for not making payment of the said retirement benefit. The petitioner further seeks a direction upon the concerned respondents to ensur

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top