SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(Pat) 985

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Arvind Singh Chandel, J.
Amit Kumar Singh @ Amit Singh S/O Late Rameshwar Singh - Appellant
Vs.
The State Of Bihar, Through Principal Secretary, Home, Govt. Of Bihar, Old Secretariat, Patna. Bihar - Respondent
Criminal Writ Jurisdiction Case No 1 of 2024
Decided On : 06-12-2024

Advocate Appeared:
For the Petitioners:M/s Suraj Samdarshi, Sanjay Jha, Simran Kumari, Advocates
For the State : Mr Deepak Kumar, AC to GP IV
For the Respondent: M/s Anshul, Avinash Kr Singh, Advs.

Delay in filing a complaint and lack of criminal intent render allegations of cheating and fraud insufficient to constitute a cognizable offence under IPC.

Headnote:(A) Indian Penal Code, 1860 - Sections 406, 420/34 - Quashing of FIR - Petitioners sought to quash FIR alleging cheating and fraud in a business transaction involving a significant sum of money. The court found that the allegations constituted a civil dispute rather than a criminal offence. The delay in filing the FIR was deemed unreasonable, and the absence of deceitful intent was noted. (Paras 2, 10, 12)

(B) Delay in filing FIR - The court emphasized that inordinate delay in filing a complaint without reasonable explanation can be fatal to the prosecution's case. (Paras 9, 10)

(C) Ingredients of criminal offence - The court ruled that the FIR did not disclose necessary ingredients to constitute offences under Sections 406 and 420 IPC, reaffirming that mere breach of contract does not equate to criminal liability. (Paras 10, 12)

Facts of the case:
The petitioners were accused of fraudulently obtaining money from the informant under the pretext of a business partnership related to a mining auction. The informant alleged non-refund of the amount deposited.

Findings of Court:
The court found the FIR to be lodged after an unreasonable delay and established that the dispute was purely civil in nature.

Issues: The main issues included whether the FIR disclosed a cognizable offence and the implications of the delay in filing the complaint.

Ratio Decidendi: The court held that the allegations did not constitute a criminal offence and emphasized the importance of timely legal action in such disputes.

Result: FIR quashed.

JUDGMENT :

This petition has been preferred by the petitioner seeking the following reliefs:

    “i) To issue an appropriate writ, order or direction in the nature of certiorari for quashing Mufassil (Gaya) PS Case No 1094/2023 dated 26.10.2023 registered under Sections 406, 420/34 of Indian Penal Code on the ground that the same is completely illegal and without any authority of law.

    (ii) To issue further appropriate writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus commanding the Respondents not to take any coercive step against the Petitioners in pursuance of Mufassil (Gaya) PS Case No 1094/2023.

    (iii) This Hon’ble Court may adjudicate and hold that no cognizable offence is made out against the Petitioners as per the contents of First Information Report and therefore the Petitioners cannot be subjected to criminal prosecution.

    (iv) To award the cost of litigation and suitable compensation to the petitioners for the loss and damages caused to them.

    (v) To grant/award and other relief or reliefs which the Petitioners may be found entitled to in the facts and circumstances of the case.”

2. According to the pleadings, on the basis of written report dated 26.10.2023 made by the informant Harendra Kumar Singh, Mufassil (Gaya) PS Case No 1094 of 2023 has been registered under Sections 406, 420/34 of the IPC against the petitioners herein and other three accused persons. It is alleged by the informant in his written complaint that the present petitioners along with other accused persons called him and informed that Gere Stone Block is going to be auctioned and offered him that he has to participate in the said Gere auction on behalf of their company, namely, Octale Sales Private Limited, Champion Group of Company and Champion Omdev Construction Limited in lieu of share in the aforesaid companies. Allegedly, on the basis of said assurance, the complainant/informant returned back. However, the petitioners and other named persons did not proceed any further with the transaction. Suddenly, some day prior to the auction, they came to his house and requested him to give money for partnership. Upon repeated requests, on 05.01.2015, he deposited a sum of Rs 2.35 crores from his account as well as account of one Amresh Kumar Singh in the two accounts of petitioners’ company consequent to which they issued a power of attorney to participate in the auction. On the basis of said power of attorney, he participated in the auction and auction was finalized in the name of Octale Sales Private Limited. On the date of auction also, the informant deposited Rs 1,30,00,000/- by way of demand draft in the office of District Magistrate and the rest amount of Rs 37,50,000/- was also deposited in the account of Octale Sales to be deposited before the District Mining Office. Therefore, a total sum of Rs 4,02,50,000/- was given by the informant but neither did the accused persons refunded the money nor did they give share in the company upon which the informant came to believe that the accused persons have committed cheating and fraud. A legal notice was also sent by the informant in the month of April, 2023 which was never replied, then written complaint was filed by the informant. On the basis of above mentioned facts, FIR has been registered.

3. It is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioners that the informant only deposited Rs 1.98 crores instead of Rs 2.35 crores which is duly reflected in the books of accounts of Champion Group of Companies for the year, 2015 and the ledger account of the informant Harendra Singh. He further submits that the informant Harendra Singh had obtained minerals from the stone mines from the share of the Champion Group of Companies and, thus, the said amount was duly repaid. Further referring to the books of accounts of Champion Group of Companies for the year 2018 – 2019 (Annexure P/3), it is submitted by the counsel that according to the entries made in the books of accounts in the name of informant Harendra Singh, only Rs

    Click Here to Read the rest of this document
    1
    2
    3
    4
    5
    6
    7
    8
    9
    10
    11
    SupremeToday Portrait Ad
    supreme today icon
    logo-black

    An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

    Please visit our Training & Support
    Center or Contact Us for assistance

    qr

    Scan Me!

    India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

    For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

    whatsapp-icon Back to top