Back
MOHIT KUMAR SHAH
Sunaina Devi – Appellant
Versus
Om Krishna Prasad Sinha – Respondent
Mohit Kumar Shah, J.—The present writ petition has been filed seeking the following relief(s):—
“1.That, this writ application is for quashing the order dated 16.7.2014 passed by learned Sub Judge, III, Hajipur, in Title Suit No. 106 of 1987 as contained in Annexure 2 by which the application filed under Order 1, Rule 10 (2) of the Code of Civil Procedure for deleting the names of Defendant No. 4 to 8 from the Plaint has been rejected.”
2. The learned counsel for the parties have pointed out, at the outset, that earlier writ petitions were being filed against the interlocutory orders (such orders which have not finally decided the suits or proceedings in favour of the parties and the suits or such proceedings have not stood disposed off), in view of the law laid down by the learned Division Bench of this Court in a judgment dated 13.05.2010, passed in C.R. no. 1067 of 2009 (Durga Devi vs. Vijay Kumar Poddar & Ors.), however, subsequently, the Hon’ble Apex Court, by a judgment rendered in the case of Radhey Shyam and Another vs. Chhabi Nath and Others, reported in (2015) 5 SCC 423, has held that judicial orders of the Civil Court are not amenable to writ jurisdiction under Article 226
Judicial orders of civil courts are not subject to writ jurisdiction under Article 226; challenges must be made through appeal or revision under Article 227.
Judicial orders of civil courts are not subject to writ jurisdiction under Article 226 of the Constitution, and Article 227 jurisdiction is distinct.
Judicial orders of civil courts are not subject to writ jurisdiction under Article 226; challenges must be made through appeals or revisions under Article 227.
Judicial orders of civil courts are not subject to writ jurisdiction under Article 226; Article 227 provides distinct jurisdiction.
Judicial orders of civil courts are not subject to writ jurisdiction under Article 226; challenges must be made through appeal or revision, with Article 227 providing distinct jurisdiction.
Judicial orders of civil courts are not subject to writ jurisdiction under Article 226; challenges must be made through appeal or revision, with Article 227 providing distinct jurisdiction.
Judicial orders of civil courts are not subject to writ jurisdiction under Article 226 of the Constitution of India; challenges to such orders must be made through appeals or under Article 227.
Judicial orders of civil courts are not subject to writ jurisdiction under Article 226; challenges must be made through appeal or revision.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
