Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
PURNENDU SINGH
Md. Hashim Raza S/o Md. Kalamuddin – Appellant
Versus
State of Bihar – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. petitioners' requests for writ relief (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. legal qualifications of petitioners and state arguments (Para 3 , 4) |
| 3. court's consideration of educational qualifications (Para 5 , 6 , 7) |
| 4. recognition of adeeb-e-mahir degree (Para 8 , 9) |
| 5. court's decision to quash state actions against petitioners (Para 10 , 11 , 12) |
JUDGMENT :
PURNENDU SINGH, J.
1. Heard Mr. Mrityunjay Kumar along with Mr. Mukesh Kr. Singh, learned counsels appearing on behalf of the petitioners and Mr. Prabhakar Jha, learned GP 27 along with Mr. Umesh Narayan Dubey, learned counsel for the State.
2. Petitioners have inter alia prayed for following reliefs in the paragraphs No.1 of the writ petition:-
“(i) For issuance of a writ in the nature of Certiorary or any other appropriate writ/order/direction to quash or set aside the letter no.543 and 545 dated 05.05.2020 issued by the District Programme Officer (Establishment), Aurangabad by which the Block Teacher Employment Unit, Kutumba and Navinagar respectively and all the concern Panchayat Teacher Employment Unit of Kutumba & Navinagar Block have been directed to remove those teachers who are working on the basis of the certificates which are
The court affirmed that a valid Adeeb-e-mahir degree is equivalent to intermediate qualifications, allowing the petitioners to continue their roles as teachers despite state claims of non-recognition....
The court reaffirmed that appointments based on invalid qualifications can be deemed fraudulent and upheld the necessity of proving the legitimacy of educational credentials.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
