Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
A.Abhishek Reddy
Upendra Kumar S/o Gudari Ram – Appellant
Versus
State of Bihar – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. petitioner seeks to quash order based on false complaint. (Para 3 , 4) |
| 2. respondents argue validity of complaint against petitioner. (Para 5 , 6) |
| 3. documents substantiate petitioner's identity as upendra kumar. (Para 7 , 8 , 9) |
| 4. court set aside order; directs resumption of services. (Para 10) |
JUDGMENT :
A. Abhishek Reddy, J.
Heard the learned counsel for the parties.
Re: I.A. No. 02 of 2024.
For the reasons mentioned in the above Interlocutory Application, the same is allowed.
Registry is directed to make necessary changes.
The present writ petition has been filed for the following reliefs:-
“1. That this an application for issuance of a writ of certiorari for quashing the order dated 05.10.23 passed by the Learned Divisional Commissioner, Patna in BTPDS Control Revision No. 274/2022 whereby and whereunder the PDS licence already granted by the District level selection communittee Buxar has been directed to cancel and District Officer has been directed to take decision to pass order.
RELIEFS:-
I. The impugned order dated 05.10.2023 passed by the learned Divisional Commissioner Patna be set-aside whereby and whereunder the PDS Licence already granted in favour of petitione
Administrative decisions must be based on substantial evidence, and procedural fairness requires careful consideration of credible evidence before any actions are taken.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
