Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Chandra Shekhar Jha
Priyanshu Thakur S/o Ramji Thakur – Appellant
Versus
State of Bihar – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
Chandra Shekhar Jha, J.
1. Heard the parties.
2. The present appeal preferred by appellant/convict, namely, Priyanshu Thakur against judgment of conviction dated 10.07.2023 and order of sentence dated 18.07.2023 passed by learned 7th ADJ cum Exclusive Special Judge (POCSO), Sasaram in connection with POCSO Case No. 41 of 2022 (arising out of Kachhwan P.S. Case No. 100 of 2021), whereby and where under appellant/convict has been convicted for the offence punishable under Section 366 (A), 366 of IPC and Sections 4 and 6 of POCSO Act and has directed the appellant to undergo R.I. for 10 years and fine of Rs. 1,00,000/- and in default of payment of fine he is directed to further undergo RI for one year for the offence under Section 4 of the POCSO Act, period of custody of accused person during trial in this case shall be set of in sentence passed by this court.
3. Case of prosecution in brief is that Priyanshu Thakur (appellant) was the home tutor of the daughter /victim (aged about 17 years). It is alleged that during dushara time a conflict occurred between appellant and the brother of informant due to which the parents of appellant told the informant that one day they will ma
The conviction was quashed due to insufficient evidence and credibility issues with the victim, highlighting the necessity of establishing a solid evidentiary foundation in sexual assault cases.
The prosecution failed to establish the victim's age as a child under the POCSO Act, leading to the quashing of the conviction due to insufficient evidence and credibility issues.
The prosecution must establish the victim's age and provide corroborative evidence in cases involving allegations under the POCSO Act; a conviction cannot be based solely on the uncorroborated testim....
The prosecution failed to establish the elements of penetrative sexual assault under the POCSO Act, leading to the quashing of conviction due to insufficient evidence and unreliable witness testimoni....
The prosecution failed to establish the case beyond reasonable doubt due to contradictions in the victim's testimony and lack of corroborative medical evidence.
The prosecution must prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt, and the quality of evidence is essential in criminal law.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
