SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Pat) 733

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CHANDRA SHEKHAR JHA, J.
Kitti Nawani @ Kishore Nawani S/o Late Mohan Lal Nawani - Petitioner
Versus
The State of Bihar - Respondent 
Criminal Miscellaneous No.27343 of 2024
Decided On : 17-06-2025

Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Petitioner:Mr. P.N. Shahi, Senior Advocate Mr. Rishi Raj Raman, Advocate
For the State : Mr. Anuj Kumar Shrivastava, APP
for the O.P. No.2 :Mr. Rana Vikram Singh, Advocate

Court affirmed that defenses in criminal proceedings are evaluated at trial and not during quashing applications, emphasizing the necessity to substantiate allegations properly.

Headnote:(A) Indian Penal Code - Sections 406, 504, 420, 120-B - Quashing application under Section 482 CrPC - Allegations against petitioner include misappropriation of funds, criminal breach of trust, and cheating - Court found that the complaint lacks merit due to failure to substantiate allegations and because witness bias was evident - Petitioner’s acceptance of donations in personal capacity but justifying this as loans to the society - Allegations of conspiracy to mislead and alter governance structure of the society discussed - Prior complaints and responses presented, indicating a personal vendetta against petitioner - Petitioner's previous compliance with societal matters and response to previous legal issues highlighted. (Paras 1-24)

Findings of Court:
The court determined that the petitioner had accepted donations in his personal account, leading to a prima facie appearance of wrongdoing, but emphasized that defenses are to be evaluated at trial, not at this stage.

Issues: The main issues revolve around the legitimacy of the complaint, whether sufficient justification exists to quash the proceedings, and the implications of the petitioner’s past actions.

Ratio Decidendi: The court reaffirmed that during quashing applications, it does not assess the merit of defenses but rather the presence of sufficient grounds to continue proceedings; given the established absconder status of petitioner, relief was denied.

Result: Quashing petition dismissed.

Table of Content
1. overview of allegations against petitioner (Para 1 , 2)
2. petitioner's arguments on authority and bias (Para 3 , 4)
3. defense against personal details allegations (Para 5 , 6 , 7)
4. fir allegations and documentary evidence (Para 8 , 9)
5. procedural issues in lower court (Para 10 , 11)
6. petitioner's actions and legal standing (Para 12 , 19 , 21)
7. interventions by higher courts (Para 13 , 15)
8. criteria for quashing legal proceedings (Para 14 , 18 , 20 , 22)
9. final decision on quashing request (Para 24 , 25)

JUDGMENT :

CHANDRA SHEKHAR JHA, J.

The present quashing application/petition preferred u/s 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure (in short ‘CrPC’) on behalf of the petitioner for quashing of the entire proceedings arising out of Complaint Case No. 2042 of 2014, wherein cognizance has been taken against the petitioner/accused for the offences punishable under Sections 406, 504, 420 and 120-B of the Indian Penal Code (in short ‘IPC’) by the court of learned A.C.J.M., Gaya.

2. Allegation as averred in complaint case, suggest that “Buddhist Thai Bharat Society” (in short ‘Society”) is a charitable welfare society duly registered under the Societies Registration Act, where petitioner was inducted initially as member of society, who in due course of time, elected its General Secretary. It is alleged that petitioner in capacity of General Secretary of the Society committed numerous illegal acts with malafide intention, which caused wrongful loss to the Society and wrongful gain to himself. It is alleged that petitioner received donations and contributions made for the society in personal capacity and later on transferred the said money to the account of society by showing it as a loan given by him to the society and, therefore, he committed criminal breach of trust and also misappropriation of the fund of the society. As per the audit report for the year 2008-09, a sum of Rs. 25,28,646/- was shown as loan to the society, whereas in actual, the aforesaid amount was donated to society by different donors. It is further alleged that petitioner inducted his relatives in the governing body of society with malicious intention of securing majority of his own men in the governing body and thus, changed the democratic structure of the society for his wrongful personal gain. It is submitted that petitioner under conspiracy dishonestly removed several original documents, registers, sanctioned buildings plan, bank passbooks, bank statement, cheque books etc. of the society and despite of repeated requests did not return the same to O.P. No.2 and dishonestly committed theft. The petitioner and accused no.2 did not convene the general body meeting and did not conduct the election. It is also alleged that petitioner committed cheating and fraud with respect to his personal details in his passport with mala fide intention of obtaining wrongful gain for himself from the Government of India. Allegedly, the petitioner is a citizen of Thailand and possesses two passports in which his date of birth is the same i.e. 18.11.1947 but in the declaration regarding place of birth his one of the passports, he mentioned ‘Karanchi’ then in India as his place of birth and in another passport, same is being mentioned as ‘Bangkok’, (Thailand). It is also alleged that activities of the petitioner and accused no.2, namely Sarju Prasad were protested by O.P. No.2 and other members of the society, as they fraudulently interpolated the rules and regulations of the society to make them office bearers/members of governing body permanently, which was inserted in memorandum of society without informing the members of the society in the year 2014 but same was fraudulently inserted antedated showing 29.02.2008, which was informed to I.G. Registration, Patna on 07.04.2014. It is also alleged that petitioner along with accused no.2 in conspiracy, purchased several acres of “Parwana land” in Bodh Gaya on 15.05.2014, 16.06.2014 and 24.07.2014 by means of cheatin

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
Judicial Analysis

AI

SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top