SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Pat) 1561

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
P.B. Bajanthri, ACJ., S.B. PD. SINGH, J.
Soma Raha @ Soma Aich @ Soma Aice @ Soma Raha Aich D/o Shyamal Aich, W/o Partho Sarthi Raha -Appellant 
Versus
Partho Sarthi Raha Son of late Panay Kumar Raha – Respondent
Miscellaneous Appeal No.896 of 2018
Decided on : 18-09-2025

Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellant :Mr. Mukesh Kumar Jha, Advocate Mr. Bhola Prasad, Advocate

Cruelty and desertion can serve as grounds for divorce when substantiated by evidence of persistent abusive behavior and long-term separation.

Headnote:(A) Family Court Act, 1984 - Section 19(1) - Dissolution of marriage - Appeal against Family Court’s dismissal of divorce suit on grounds of cruelty and desertion - Appellant alleges persistent dowry demands and physical assault - Respondent denies allegations, claiming the appeal is fabricated - Family Court's dismissal based on lack of evidence - Long separation stated as a key factor - Divorce granted by appellate court, indicating irreparable breakdown of marriage. (Paras 3, 11, 12, 17-23)

(B) Definition of cruelty - No precise definition under Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 - Conduct causing reasonable apprehension of harm or injury to the spouse can amount to cruelty. (Paras 13, 14)

(C) Grounds for divorce - Long periods of separation and non-cohabitation contribute to claims of desertion and cruelty. (Paras 17, 21)

Facts of the case:
The appellant and respondent were married on 23.04.2000, having one daughter. The appellant alleges recurrent torture by the respondent for dowry, culminating in physical violence. Their last cohabitation ended on 10.03.2013. (Paras 3, 21)

Findings of Court:
The respondent failed to provide evidence contradicting the appellant's claims, resulting in a finding of long-term separation and marital breakdown beyond repair. (Paras 21, 22)

Issues: Whether the appeal is valid based on the allegations of cruelty and desertion and whether the Family Court's decision was sustainable. (Paras 11, 12)

Ratio Decidendi: The court emphasized that persistent misconduct affecting a spouse’s mental health constitutes cruelty. Long separation supports the claim of desertion. (Paras 13-14, 18-22)

Result: Appeal allowed; marriage dissolved by decree of divorce.

Table of Content
1. grounds for divorce include cruelty and desertion. (Para 2 , 3)
2. respondent's denial of allegations and claims. (Para 4 , 9)
3. definition and parameters of cruelty established. (Para 13 , 14 , 15)
4. long separation evidences breakdown beyond repair. (Para 17 , 18)
5. legal reasoning support claim of desertion and divorce. (Para 21 , 22)
6. decree of divorce granted. (Para 23 , 24 , 26)

JUDGMENT :

S. B. PD. SINGH, J.

1. Heard learned counsel for the appellant. None appears on behalf of the respondent.

2. The present appeal has been filed under Section 19 (1) of the Family Court Act , 1984 impugning the judgment and decree dated 11.09.2018 passed by learned Principal Judge, Family Court, Purnea in Matrimonial Case No. 93 of 2014, whereby the matrimonial suit, preferred by the appellant, seeking dissolution of marriage, has been dismissed.

3. The case of the appellant as per petition filed before the Family Court is that the marriage of the appellant with respondent was solemnized on 23.04.2000 at Kolkata as per Hindu rights and customs. The marriage was registered under Special Marriage Act . At the time of marriage, the father of the appellant spent Rs. 9 lakhs on articles and sent the same with the appellant. The marriage was consummated and out of the wedlock, a girl-child was born who is now 11 years old. After one year of the marriage, the appellant found the behavior of the respondent towards her was not very good and he had his eyes on the appellant’s jewellery and he deceived her and kept her jewellery with himself in the name of keeping it in a bank locker and gradually misused by selling them and also repeatedly pressurized the appellant to ask for money from her father. The appellant is the only daughter of her parents, therefore, they kept fulfilling the demands of the respondent for the appellant’s happy married life but respondent’s demand kept increasing day by day and when it increased beyond limits, the appellant’s father became unable to fulfill the demand, as a result of which, the respondent started torturing and assaulting the appellant for non-fulfillment of dowry demand. The appellant kept tolerating all the atrocities on herself for the sake of her daughter’s future. The respondent always kept lying to her for illegal demands and always kept assuring that her jewellery has been kept in the bank locker. The respondent always ignored appellant’s words and never fulfilled his marital obligations. The appellant further alleges that the respondent always contacted her for sexual pleasure and never gave her the respect of a wife and he repeatedly went to her father’s house for money. The respondent being husband never behaved well with the appellant and always used to torture and assault the appellant. Her parents and relatives made a lot of efforts to convince the respondent but all their efforts went in vein. She further alleges that being an ideal wife, she kept tolerating all the atrocities of respondent whereas the respondent, in order to hide his wrong conduct, kept tarnishing her reputation by making false allegations against her and kept increasing her mental agony and always kept saying that he cannot maintain marital relations with her. The harassment by the respondent kept increasing day by day and on 08.03.2013, when the appellant got fed up of the atrocities of respondent and made protest, she was beaten badly with an intention to kill and she was locked in a room. The appellant’s parents made a lot of efforts to convince the respondent but he was not ready to live with the appellant and from 10.03.2013 he has completely deserted her. The appellant further alleges that due to the cruel behavior, betrayal, fraud and daily mental torture, it is very difficult to maintain marital relations with the respondent. Hence, the appellant has no other option but to file the present divorce petition for dissolution of marriage with the respondent-husband.

4. The respondent-husband appeared and file

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top