Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
BIBEK CHAUDHURI, ANSHUMAN
Shatrughan Ram @ Shatrudhan Das Son of Lalchand Ram – Appellant
Versus
State of Bihar – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
BIBEK CHAUDHURI, J.
1. The instant criminal appeal is directed against a judgement of conviction and sentence passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge, Fast Track, 2nd Court at Patna on 16th of February, 2019, whereby and whereunder, the learned Trial Judge held the appellant guilty for committing offence under Sections 376/302 of the Indian Penal Code and convicted and sentenced him to suffer rigorous imprisonment for life for the offence punishable under Section 376 of the IPC and rigorous imprisonment for life till the end of his natural life for the offence punishable under Section 302 of the .
2. On the basis of an oral statement made by one Jawahar Kumar Ray of village Mohaddipur, which was reduced to writing by Sub-Inspector, K. N. Paswan on 17th of December, 2007, S.K. Puri P.S Case No. 228 of 2007, dated 17th of December, 2007, for the offence punishable under Sections 376 and 302 of the Indian Penal Code was registered.
3. It is alleged by the informant that at the relevant point when the alleged incident took place, he used to reside at New Punaichak, Jhuggi-Jhopadpatti by the side of the railway line within Police Station-S. K. Puri. On 16th of December, 2
Mere recovery of minor rape-murder victim's body from accused's locked room, without proof of last seen together, accused's presence or forensic link, fails to form complete circumstantial chain for ....
Circumstantial evidence must establish a conclusive chain consistent with the accused's guilt; suspicion cannot replace proof beyond reasonable doubt in criminal convictions.
The importance of proving guilt beyond all reasonable doubt in cases relying on circumstantial evidence.
The judgment establishes the principles of circumstantial evidence, the last seen theory, and the burden of proof under Section 106 of the Indian Evidence Act in establishing guilt in criminal cases.
The sufficiency of circumstantial evidence and the need for a complete chain of evidence to establish guilt beyond reasonable doubt.
The absence of corroborative evidence from reliable witnesses and the failure of the prosecution to establish a motive led to the overturning of the conviction based on circumstantial evidence.
The judgment emphasizes the importance of considering the testimonies of witnesses, especially in child rape cases, and the need for proper legal protection for minor victims.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
