SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1980 Supreme(Cal) 271

SUDHINDRA MOHAN GUHA
Paritosh Kumar Ghose – Appellant
Versus
Saraswati Nandi – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Dipankar Gupta and M.M. Mullick, for Petitioner; Ramapati Roy, for Respondent.

Judgement

ORDER :- This revision arises out of an order dated 19th January, 1979, passed by Shri M.K. Sen Gupta, the learned Munsif, 2nd Court, Alipore in T.S. No. 414 of 1972, striking out defence of the petitioner against ejectment under Section 17(3) of the West Bengal Premises Tenancy Act, 1956.

2. This suit was commenced on 20th December, 1972, for ejectment on the ground of default in payment of rents for the months of May to August, 1972 and also on the ground of plaintiffs own use and occupation. The summons being served on 1st January, 1973, the defendant made his appearance on 24th January, 1973. In the written statement the defendant came up with a plea of payment of rent. The defendant having failed to move the Court under Section 17(2) of the Act the plaintiff was obliged to file an application under Section 17(3) of the Act on 14th July, 1978. But on 9th August, 1978, an application under Section 17(1) of the Act read with Section 151 C.P. Code was filed praying for permission to deposit a sum of Rs, 638/- being Rs. 400/- as arrears of rent and Rs. 238/- as statutory interest, though in the petition, the plea of payment was reiterated. There was also an application unde












Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top