PRANAB KUMAR CHATTOPADHYAY, TAPAN MUKHERJEE
Oriental Bank of Commerce – Appellant
Versus
Santosh Kumar Agarwal – Respondent
PRANAB KUMAR CHATTOPADHYAY, J. :- This appeal has been preferred at the instance of the defendant-Oriental Bank of Commerce from the judgment and decree dated 18th January, 2001 passed in C. S. No. 216 of 1996.
2. The claim of the plaintiff in the suit is based on several Fixed Deposits mentioned in the Schedule being Annexure 'A' to the plaint. All the aforesaid Fixed Deposits were admittedly made jointly by the plaintiff and the pro forma defendant at the Khidderpore branch of the Oriental Bank of Commerce, which is outside the Ordinary Original Civil Jurisdiction of this Hon'ble Court.
3. The judgment and decree passed by the learned Single Judge was assailed by the defendant-appellant bank on various grounds mentioned in the Memorandum of Appeal. The learned Senior Counsel representing the appellant-bank concentrated the argument mainly on the ground of jurisdiction as according to the appellant, suit filed by the plaintiff is not at all maintainable in the Ordinary Original Civil Jurisdiction of this Hon'ble Court since according to the said appellant, no part of the cause of action has arisen within the Ordinary Original Civil Jurisdiction of this Hon'ble Court, Since
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.