H. J. KANIA, M. PATANJALI SASTRI, S. R. DASS
Chittaranjan Mukherji – Appellant
Versus
Barhoo Mahto – Respondent
Judgement
PATANjALI SASTRI J. : This appeal arises out of an application for revocation of the leave obtained by the appellant for the institution of a suit on the original side of the High Court at Calcutta for a declaration that a partnership entered into by him with the respondent had been dissolved, or in the alternative, for a dissolution of the partnership, and for accounts and other consequential reliefs.
2. It was alleged in the plaint that the partnership was entered into orally at Calcutta in or about January 1944 on certain terms which were subsequently confirmed by the respondent on l4-12-l944 by a letter addressed to the appellant in Calcutta. The suit was instituted on 17-2-1947. On 3rd March 1947 the appellant applied for a temporary injunction restraining the respondent from realising or withdrawing moneys due is respect of contracts alleged to have been undertaken on behalf of the partnership and for the appointment of a receiver to take charge of the entire partnership assets. The respondent entered appearance on 11-3-1947, and with his consent an order was passed by Ormond J. appointing two joint receivers to collect Rs. 21, 000- admittedly due to the partnership f
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.