S.C.DEB, A.C.GUPTA
RADHA GOBINDA JEW – Appellant
Versus
KEWALA DEVI JAISWAL – Respondent
( 1 ) THIS Letters Patent Appeal arises out of the Title Suit No. 101 of 1967 of the Court of the learned Munsif at Krishnagore filed by the appellants for a declaration that the premises No. 6 Bansidhar Lane, Calcutta and a property at Nabadwip are debutter properties of the plaintiff deities and for permanent injunction restraining the respondent No. 1 from interfering with their possession of the said Calcutta property and from exercising any act of possession including the realization of rents of the said property.
( 2 ) THESE are the main averments made in the plaint. Chintaharan Kundu and his two brothers were members of an undivided joint Hindu family and out of their joint family funds they purchased the aforesaid Calcutta property in the name of Chintaharan and the said Nabadwip property in the name of Krishnakamini Devi, the wife of Chintaharan. They divided all their properties by a Deed of Partition dated January 12, 1922 and these two properties were allotted to Chintaharan who dedicated them to the appellant deities by a Deed of Arpannama dated 12. 1. 1922. Chintaharan and Krishna Kamini died respectively in the years 1923 and 1940 and before their death the
REFERRED TO : Panna Banerjee v. Kalikinkar Ganguly
Gauri Shankar v. M/s. Hindustan Trust P. Ltd.
State of Orissa v. Sudhansu Shekar Misra
Ram Charan Das v. Girja Nandini Devi
Nedunuri Kameswaramma v. Sampati Subba Rao
Janakiram Iyer v. Nilkanta Iyer
Srinivas Raddier v. Ramaswamy Reddier
C. Mohammad Yunus v. Syed Unniassa
Sanat Kumar Mitra v. Hem Chandra Dev
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.