CHITTATOSH MUKHERJEE
SHYAM SUNDAR RATHI – Appellant
Versus
ADDL. DISTRICT MAGISTRATE, BANKURA – Respondent
( 1 ) THE petitioner claims that by a registered Kobala. dated August 27, 1967, he purchased 9. 28 acres of land appertaining to Plot No. 61 R. S. Khatian No. 74 Mouza Santore, District Bankura. The said plot was recorded as an agricultural land in the R. S. Records. The petitioner carries on business of manufacturing bricks. On December 26, 1966, he applied to the Additional District Magistrate, Bankura for granting him a Mining Lease under the West Bengal Minor Minerals Rules. 1959 for extracting earth for brick making from the aforesaid plot of land.
( 2 ) ACCORDING to the petitioner, the authorities did not dispose of his said ap-plication for licence either by granting or refusing the same. On May 6, 1970. the Additional District Magistrate, Bankura by his Memo. No. 2309/e. A. served a notice upon the petitioner stating that it had come to his notice that the petitioner had manufactured bricks unautho-risedly by digging and using brick-earth of the plot No. 61 of Mouza Santore without obtaining any mining lease. The Additional District Magistrate directed the petitioner to show cause by June 2, 1970 why he shall not be prosecuted under Rule 25 of the
REFERRED TO : Raja Anand Brahma Shah v. The State of Uttar Pradesh
Baijnath Kedia v. The State of Bihar
State of Orissa v. M.A Tullochand Co.
State of Bombay v. F.N.Balsara
A.S.Krishna v. State of Madras
State of West Bengal v. Jagadamba Prasad Singh
Hingir-Rampur Coal Co. Ltd v. State of Orissa
The State of Madras v. Gannon Dunkeriey and Co. (Madras) Ltd.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.