SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1974 Supreme(Cal) 123

B.C.MITRA, GHOSH
JALPAIGURI CINEMA CO. LTD. – Appellant
Versus
PROMOTHA NATH MUKHERJEE – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Gupta, Samaren Sen

GHOSE, J.

( 1 ) THIS appeal is directed against the judgment and order dated November 29, 1973, directing, inter alia, the respondents Pramotha Nath Mukherjee and Monoranjan Mukherjee to be added as parties to the Company Petition No. 398 of 1972 and granting leave to the said respondents to continue the said company petition and all proceedings thereunder, and further directing the original petitioner, Dilip Kumar Ganguli of the said Company Petition No. 398 of 1972, to be transposed to the category of respondents and all consequential amendments to be carried out in the cause title of the said company petition.

( 2 ) THE said company petition was filed on October 3, 1972, by the original petitioner, Dilip Kumar Ganguli, who was at all material times and still now is a shareholder of the Jalpaiguri Cinema Company Ltd. , an existing company within the meaning of the Companies Act, 1956, under Sections 397 and 398 of the Companies Act, 1956.

( 3 ) THE company was incorporated under the Indian Companies Act, 1913, in 1948. One of the promoters of the company was Nagendra Nath Ganguli. The company started construction of a cinema hall, but failed to continue the construction for pa



























































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top