DIPAK KUMAR SEN
GANPATRAI SAGARMULL – Appellant
Versus
UNION OF INDIA (UOI) – Respondent
( 1 ) THE plaintiffs, Messrs. Ganpatrai Sagarmull and K. P. Ramaswami Nadar, have instituted this suit against the Union of India, claiming, inter alia, a decree for Rupees 10,017/- in favour of either in the alternative; alternatively, an enquiry into damages and decree for such sum as may be found due, interest, costs and other reliefs.
( 2 ) IT is alleged in the plaint that at all material times M/s. Ganapatrai Sagarmull, the plaintiff No. 1 acted as the commission agents of K. P. Ramaswami Nadar, the plaintiff No. 2 for sale of cardamoms in Calcutta. It is alleged that on or about the 10th April, 1964, the plaintiff No. 2 delivered to the South Eastern Railways eight bags of dry cardamoms for transportation from Virudhu-nagar to Shalimar under a Railway Receipt dated the 10th April, 1964 bearing No. C. 558753 issued in favour of the plaintiff No. 2.
( 3 ) IT is alleged that the plaintiff No. 2 was the consignor as also consignee of the said goods. It is alleged further that the plaintiff No. 2 endorsed the said Railway Receipt in favour of K. P. Ramaswami Nadar Sons and Co, a sister concern of the plaintiff No. 2 and made over the same with intent to pass
Mohammed Safique v. Union of India
Port of Calcutta v. General Trading Corporation
Morvi Mercantile Bank v. Union of India
Dharni Dhar v. Dist. Co-op. Bank
Devagiri Temple v. Pattabhirami
Referred to : Hari Mohan Dutt v. Dominion of India
I.S.P.Trading Co. v. Union of India
Alliance Assurance Co. Ltd. v. Union of India
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.