SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1972 Supreme(Cal) 182

AMARESH ROY
PRABHU DAYAL MARWARI – Appellant
Versus
TINKARI BALA DASSI – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
BIDYUT KIRAN MUKHERJI, DHRUBA MUKHERJI, S.C.DAS GUPTA, SANKAR MUKHERJI

AMARESH ROY, J.

( 1 ) THERE are two appeals. These two appeals arise put of two suits between the same parties. In one, which was Title Suit No. 55 of 1962, the predecessor of the present respondents was the plaintiff and the present appellant was the defendant. In the other suit, which was Title Suit No. 86 of 1963, the present appellant was the plaintiff and the predecessor of the present respondents was the defendant. Both the suits were over the dispute between the parties regarding a property which was the common disputed property in both, the suits. The background of that dispute was the undisputed fact that Gour Chandra Das, who was the predecessor of the present respondents was the owner of the suit land and he inducted the present appellant Prabhu Dayal Marwari into possession of the suit land as a tenant by a contract of tenancy which has been brought in the evidence in the case as Exhibit F. In it there was a stipulation that the tenant will pay a monthly rent at first fixed at Rs. 9-8 annas per month and a hut will be constructed costs of which construction will be initially borne by the said tenant Prabhu Dayal Marwari, but the amount of the expenses of the constructi


















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top