SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1972 Supreme(Cal) 251

P.C.BOROOAH, PARIMAL KUMAR CHANDA
A. K. GHOSH – Appellant
Versus
STATE – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
B.C.RAY, BENOY KRISHNA RAJ, G.MITTER, J.M.BANERJI, P.C.GHOSH, S.K.ACHARYA, S.ROY CHAUDHARY, TAPAN BANERJI

CHANDA, J.

( 1 ) BY the instant application, A. K. Ghosh, Director Enforcement Directorate, Government of India, has prayed for setting aside the order No. 21 dated 29. 1. 72 passed in Case No. C/943 of 1970 by the learned Presidency Magistrate, 10th Court, Calcutta by which the learned Magistrate has discharged Section 253 (1) Cr. P. C. holding that prosecution under Sec. 23f of the Foreign Exchange Regulation Act is not maintainable and the materials on record are not sufficient to warrant the conviction of the accused. Dharam Chand Jain, O. P. No. 2, under

( 2 ) THE circumstances under which the complaint was filed may be briefly stated: -dharam Chand Jain, O. P. No. 2, was one of the Directors of M/s. Missirlal Dharam Chand (P) Ltd. engaged in the business of export of manganese ore with a foreign company namely, Messrs Ferro Metal and Chemical Corporation Ltd. , having its office at London and New York. On the allegation that M/s. Missirlal Dharam Chand (P) Ltd. was maintaining and operating accounts in foreign countries illegally, adjudication proceedings were started by the Director of enforcement under Section 23 (1) (a) and 23d of the Foreign Exchange Regulation Act after






Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top